37 FEEDBACK bruiser you liar

SUBSTANTIAL REWARD OFFERED

for this ‘dudes’ name and address.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

9/4/2007

Bentcops is quite a revealing insight into NZ’s police. I’m personaly familiar with some of their devious and heavy handed machinations.

The fact is that there are some good cops, and there are some bad cops. The difference? The good cops know how to bend the law to their advantage and screw the public and beat up on innocent civilians. The bad cops do the same but occasionly get found out.

Greg

That was very interesting jack, i have to say you certainly stuck to your guns aye i’m not one to bag the cops but i guess theres always gonna be some whom can justify their actions we only need to look at this stuff i read now i would like to say to you the more people challenge these things the more transperancy we will have thanks, you have a good day.

lifeboat
14/11/2004

That site was an amusing way to spend a Sunday afternoon - well done.

ferret
14/11/2004

jacobus - I spent some hours a few weeks ago, and read throughout your website.
I’m on your side with this.
I’ve seen too much of this kind of thing happening these days.

sir_rick
15/11/2004

As a young New Zealander who wants to do something useful and helpful to give back to his country I have lately seriously been considering joining the NZ Police. I believe it is a respectable and commendable job to be doing, its exciting, challenging and rewarding and would be well worthwhile getting involved in. However I must admit that with all this bad publicity lately I have been thinking carefully about exactly what type of organisation I would be joining up with. I don’t want to be apart of a corrupt an unjust organisation so in this regard I commend what jackinabox is doing. We don’t need bent cops and they need to be exposed and dealt with. But I say again, the majority of NZ’s frontline police are good decent people and it is dangerous and wrong to label them all bent and corrupt. Some systems, regulations and policies etc appear to need some serious looking in to and changing but we still need these good decent people to be out there doing the job that the majority of them do very well.

cheezels
16/11/2004

I find it all a bit scary, and was a bit sceptical as to your motives, but on the other hand I could not tear myself away and kept reading.

__LadyJan__
22/10/2004

i agree some cops in nz are just
bastards

prettygal1977
16/11/2004

From what I did read, you probably have a good case against both the police AND the neighbours.

markslovenz
16/11/2004

I read sections of it and agree that the cops and the justice system needs to be stood up to at times.

anon

If its true it would be the story of the year.

weizguy.
17/11/2004

I think police need to be a lot more accountable for their actions.
Planting evidence, making false statements etc should land them in jail.

anon

Stories are good jack - you’ve done well.
on ya mate!

daville808
28/11/2004

jack what are you trying to do with your website are you trying to get people to feel sorry for you. Are you trying to bring hate to the New Zealand police. Or are you just an idiot who has lost the plot a bit. Sure what you say in your web site sounds harsh but it is so one sided and if it is true why dont you sell up and shift house instead of ranting about how ****ty your life has become because of the Police in your area. My personal impression from your web site is that your a SLIGHTLY annoying person and just a TAD negative.

asm1979nz
10/12/2004

It’s good jack and alot of time has been put into research.

anon

I would go so far as to say that you are “anti” any law enforcement Jack and that is not good. If you lived on the right side of the law, I am sure you would not put up posts such as this. There is good and bad in any profession, none of us are perfect!!

14/2/2005
Hurstie

He does have a couple of meaningful gripes as far as the Police are concerned, Hurstie.

markslovenz
14/2/2005

You’ve certainly opened my eyes Jacobus. If I had had that load of unwarranted crap dumped on me I would have lost the plot and run amok. Keep up the good work.

sir_ric
16/12/2004

2 grand jack.. your bloody shout goodonya anyway well done.

bigkev1
28/2/2005

If this was only the limit of corruption in NZ Police we would be doing halfway ok. We need someone to come in and clean them all up and put honesty back in the Police. I am sure there must be some straight police but where I do not know.
We need someone to come in and clean them all up and put honesty back in the Police. I am sure there must be some straight police but where I do not know.

e_shaman
28/2/2005

Jack is obsessed with finding any negative he can on the police since he came out of Court on the wrong side, and he feels he has been picked on by the Police ever since.
In fact - I think he was found to be on the wrong side of the law, and I assume it involves drugs, when he tried to pop someone else - so his little vendeta against another guy did not work, and he is relentless in painting all police as black in some misguided way to make himeslf look lily whits - which he is not! This bent cops thing - is long and arduous - but interesting never the less - you just have to use common sense to fill in the blanks, and remember this is created by him - so one side to the story only

__LadyJan__
12/3/2005

Well, it’s actually very well done!! It’s horrible that you and your family (I presume?) had to go thru that and it makes me understand more about why you don’t like cops - but they are not all like that!! I know that because I have had some dealings with the police and the ones I talked to were most helpful!! The drug squad are a bunck of dicks though!!

fallen_angel_81
15/4/2005

Fuk the pig ****s any way. Go all the way with your story. It should be front page news any way. Even better tell 20/20 or 60 minutes. To show how dodgie they are.

rychess1
11/4/2005

If more people stopped moaning about the police and tried supporting them instead, things would be a whole lot better. If it wasn’t for people like Jack, we could end up with a totally corrupt police force, as you tend to find good people who would like to be doing certain jobs, don’t, as they don’t want to get involved in the crap that goes with it,
i.e. Politics, there are some great people out there that would want to help run this country for the good of all, and not just a few but can’t be bothered with the bullsh*t of the club,

So with people like Jack on there case, weeding out the bad eggs, someday we might end up with a real healthy police force…and I don’t give a sh*t if his reasons for doing so come from been given a raw deal or not.
He is doing us a real service if you think about it, and if any police can’t see what he is doing, then maybe they also have something to hide…… any sane person knows full well there a great Coppers out there, but before Jack got on the seen did you really know how many bad eggs there were, I for one didn’t, but have been mightily surprised at the number, and you have to give Jack one thing, he hasn’t posted about a copper and been in the wrong that I’m aware of, They have all been a fair cop (yes pun intended)

MutedNewt
28/4/2005

A very interesting site….

anon

I agree to a certain level that some cops in NZ are bad apples and abuse the power given to them which they are suppose to weild without prejudice and discourse.

anon

You have a great webb site but I also notice that right at the last of your webb is only four good guys.

copperboss

I spent alot of time at your site yesterday jack makes for some good reading.

anon

you are a wierdo jack, I have looked at your website and all it proves is how pathetic you are
i have every faith in the cops

anon

Hey there jack in just read part of your site and I must say, I agree with where you are going, but please don’t brand all the NZ Police with the same brush, there is good and bad in every organization, no matter where they are from and there always will be, unfourtunatly.

anon

Great stuff!
I especially liked the $2000 reimbursement for the costs relating to the private prosecution.

anon

Wow jack that page is full on! Man you fully had the proof! Did you start that page up on your own?

anon

I checked out your site and story, I believe you. The vindictive, corrupt behaviour I have witnessed from Police Officers in the same Police District as you are in is almost unbelieveable. The most incredible part is I have reported it all to the Office of the Commissioner with proof. Insead of sorting out these corrupt Police Officers they are just do their best to cover it up. Two Employment Court cases that are coming up will expose some of it. I will write a book to expose this corruption if nothing else works. Again as a former Police Officer I believe you if that makes any difference to how you feel.

Omand

Man you have a serious headspace
problem… you are definiterly 80% of the problem
here… chill out…sit back..relax… get over it…
move on… or at least try and enjoy the rest of
your life…

anon

Spent a bit of time reading your story today. A great read and very informative. I thought this **** only happened in America. Not an hours drive from me.

anon

I am very impressed Jack.
Congrats…
I had to take a second look as it looks like the NZ Police site
Well done…

anon

As a former Police Officer I have witnessed the kind of corruption of Police powers he speaks off. It is a very accurate discription of how corrupt Police Officers make it hard for honest Cops to do their jobs and maintain respect for the Police.

Omand

Pretty dangerous ground treading on the toes of the country’s police….however i can only comment on a few members of the non-uniform variety i had the misfortune of running into, and i have to say they have left a nasty impression with me. stretching the truth to suit themselves to not allowing anyone outside of themselves to view a major exhibit……..

anon

awsome reading jack

anon

I read through a bit of it.

Nice to see a tale like that hit the net because theres **** like that going on all over the country.

I bet a lot of people would be disturbed to hear how the “home invasion ” crime industry really took off with the help of NZ police, and no I’m not talking about dodgy warrants signed by compliant jp’s and court staff.

Anonymous | June 23rd, 2005 at 7:55 am

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/thepress/0,2106,3361681a13135,00.html

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/thepress/0,2106,3361680a13135,00.html

read for a good look at how police have utterly failed a couple of teenage girls and a newborn baby

Anonymous |

Wow, I’m gobsmacked, I’ve yet to read more stuff, this is the first page I’ve read so far and it’s got my full attention. I’m fed up with the separate laws for some and another set of laws for me. Man, I could tell some stories about unjust behaviour etc of Hawera Police and members of the courts and even my solicitors. Oh, and CYPFS! They are all a bunch of embiciles at most. I thought it was only in Taranaki. It seems it spreads wider than that too. Wow. And thanx for giving us the opportunity to learn who is what and so on.

Leisa

I grew up thinking Kiwi cops were good. My father was a country GP who helped the Police with car accidents, rape or assault case evidence etc and later I was part of SAR exercises with them. But a few years ago I was a witness in a traffic case and got a reality check. I now have now faith in them whatsoever. IMHO they have no interest in Justice, common sense or right and wrong. They lied, badgered witnesses to change their stories, “misplaced” statements etc. It appeared to me they had only one goal - getting as many and as serious convictions as possible. (Don’t waste your time thinking about the PCA - just see the Waitara police shooting / murder case for that one) In my view many deserve the name “PIGS” and I now have less than zero respect for them. Nowadays when I see them on the street, many look more like thugs and we see them regularly getting criminal convictions. When I see them attacking victims to rack up their score(eg prosecuting self-defenders)its obvious to me the only ones they want to protect and serve are themselves. I know one cop who left the force because “I couldn’t keep working with such a bunch or crooked nasty bas..rds and remain sane.”

God defend NZ - because these arseholes sure as hell won’t!

Chanchos muertos

Wow. Keep up the good work.

Phil Yates

I look upon this site with utter dispair and sadness…I may start up my own web site ‘www.inbredwankers.com’ and you could all feature in it. Of course I would pay royalties. I hear life is cheap, maybe you could all put your pennies together and buy one….

scud

This site is just the best. Jack should be made Prime minister. Well done, I like the way all the edges are square and there are no typo’s… must take you ages to get it so perfect?

God

You da man bro!!

Tumeke

that site bentcops is a heavily oneeyed piece of rubbish written by a person who has a serious chip on their shoulder and needs some physc help to get over it.

fatmouse

Hey there Jack. Picked up link from the Scott Watson case site and have just spent a bit of time reading the stuff here. I think it’s fair to say that the majority of cops are actually honest, intelligent and and have integrity, but history shows us again and again that there are some real dodgy examples of so-called law enforcement around. Some are straight out corrupt while others are misguided simpletons or snivelling obsequious brown-nosers. I dare say you don’t quite go out of your way to avoid aggro but nor would I. The unfortunate thing about our society is that everything is so fucking PC. You can’t get up and speak the truth because somebody might be offended. (Generally the corrupt, the clueless, the criminals, the bludgers, the minorities…etc. etc.) Oh dear… mustn’t do that. As for bagging you because you happen to be Dutch - that just shows how completely ignorant some people are. I’m a Kiwi, without a Dutch bone in my body but I know from experience that folk from the Netherlands are almost without exception honest, hard-working and none too stupid with it. I wish I could say the same of my own countrymen. I wonder how many of these drongos have been to the Netherlands. Anyway, I digress. I think your site speaks volumes about the standard of law enforcemnt here in NZ. Now they are trying to recruit school leavers. Who’s the rocket scientist who dreamt that one up? Think I’ll add a link to you from my own sites.

Gazza

I’d just like to say what an excellent site this is and Jack should be commended for helping bring this information to people. You definitley have my support.

Aidan

Great read jack I have a similar story to tell of how police have harassed my family and myself continually. Used their power and uniform to fabricate and change evidence to use to prosecute me. I believe that there are some good cops out there but its the culture they are in where they have to abide by police unspoken rules even though it could be illegal and bend to pressure otherwise they are “frozen” out

DALE

——————————————————————————–

…..woah.

Some people on here need to give it a rest.
Take some time out.
Some here are purposefully making this an annoying, immature (on their part, they know who they are with out me having to identify them) debate to be involved in by making abusive remarks and attempting to wind people up.
Pretty predictable diversionary tactics that have similarly been employed by all the great liars and cowards throughout history.
To simplify the issues of this topic and this site in general and to get back to what I perceive this site to be about one must admit that bent cops/Jack’s sole purpose isn’t just to try and bag all police employees the country over for in reality not all are baggable.
You donk, scud and co. know this so if your purpose is preserving the immaculate prestige ideology of law and order then please go and start your own site because that’s not what this one is about.
This site is about CORRUPT POLICE AND EXPOSING THEM if you didn’t notice.
You and your juvenile crew have a hard time it would seem admitting that police of this sort exist in the first place.
Police and the law and order society set themselves these lofty ideals or as individuals involve themselves out of a desire to promote them yet a lot routinely fail/ purposely fail to live up to them so they must be had up by someone because as Jack has illustrated the PCA is about as good as pissing into a Norwester on the plains of Canterbury in the height of summer.
There, thankfully, are police out there who take the role of a policeman seriously and fulfil their responsibilities to the best of their abilities and beyond.
Society is much indebted to these people as the things they have to face are more often than not negative and things the greater society would like controlled and dealt with by people other than themselves.
But from what I gather from this site generally is there is a lot of small minded pettiness and ignorance on the part of both obviously bored and incompetent human beings (Black, Cullum and possibly scud and donk but they seem slightly more capable of independent thought……slightly) and police alike.
When you have tuggers like Black and Cullum who are obviously such dishevelled serial whingers running to and fro to the cops and the local gossip mill it doesn’t take long to get a mountain from a mole hill as Jack has so eloquently detailed.
Meanwhile while the police are attending to Cullum and Black’s inane paranoid ramblings and petty oneupmanshit who knows what the police may be better spent concentrating on?
People such as Black and Cullum should be ashamed.
I think this site has a genuine purpose and seems to be monitored by a humorous (in spite of the experiences he’s had to endure), careful (in so far as collecting evidence to present a truthful account) and remarkably emotionally/mentally resourceful man (again in light of what he has had to endure - a lot of people would lose the plot but Jack has put a good deal of his no doubt frustrated energy into attempting to restore some sort of logic to the chaos of the events instead of resorting to ignorant violence).
The wider issue is the double standards that the police and the legal system as a whole regularly traipse out when they realise they have encountered someone who won’t back down to the bull shit notion that the law is god or at least some close affiliate of hers.
What about the thousands of people routinely had by the police and legal system day to day just because they lack the courage or articulate abilities of Jack?
This site is just a drop in the bucket of how corrupt and self-serving so many democracies are through their police and smaller societal governing bodies the world over.
We should be thankful we can have websites like this freely available in this country and behave like Jack and use the legal system to strive for justice.
Or would it just be easier if our police and government could kidnap, torture till guilty or kill if not guilty like China, South Africa and South America?

Whom? | August 4th, 2006 at 8:35 pm

Its quite clear that even if Jack has embellished to fill in gaps, he’s been a consistent voice of dissent to the point of annoying or all the other weak (in the face of what has been meted out to him by inbreds and police alike) points of detraction the voices of opposition here continue to attempt to introduce as counter arguments you cannot deny that people like Britton are a m m mm mmm mental menace and that the police have repeatedly failed to assist Jack after different individual police made the issue personal and closed ranks like a scared bunch of red neck dimwits.
Britton has no point in life other than to involve other people in his misery and destruction so as to create something to temporarily detract from the fact that his life is actually only self created and perpetuated misery and destruction.
Pretty typical antisocial, loser, sociopathic bull shit which in true antisocial, loser, sociopath tradition make it someone else’s problem as well.
The cops are just jocks who have become obsessed with coming out with their egos intact (a common problem with ‘I am the law’ ‘law enforcers’) which thus negates ever being able to go back on decisions and reinstate justice.
BUT DO YOU KNOW WHO ARE BELOW EVEN THESE WEAK; SUB HUMANS WHO REFUSE TO USE THEIR MIND AND MORALS?
All the pro corruption supporters who profess some objective stance/intent i.e. zebuqueen, scud, donk etc… and then the rest of the former/current cop/I’m married to a/distantly related to someone who knows someone who knows a cop, knee jerk, tosser, dyslexia suffering, addle brained, half wits ie zebuqueen,scud,donk who come here and go - ‘Hey, someone’s hassling the cops - oh look he’s Dutch oh those liberal bastards fuck he must be a pinko commy queer non DB drinking wannabe intellectual fucking probably doesn’t even play rugby fuckin’ fucker’ no brainer winners who are all denying the basic fact that there is a continual evasion of duty here on the part of the cops.
The fact that none of these pro corruption supporters for a second can even share any empathy with Jack and restrain themselves to admit that perhaps just possibly maybe there’s been a slight miscarriage of justice here on more than one time and level is absolutely disgusting.
Most of the attackers of Jack here and their behaviour is shameful and hateful and telling of the fact that these people have acute issues of their own that need addressing.
It is this kind of weak mindedness in making human rights decisions that make people like Jacks attackers perfect candidates for turncoats, informers and general brown nosers to the occupying force should a Nazi like occupation situation ever arise here.
This kind of mentality of not pursuing what’s clearly right due to having to go back on ones word appears to be extremely common in the practice of the NZ government, police and other petty beauracracies such as CYPS, WINZ and Study Link - the last three all absolutely pathetically mismanaged organizations.
And don’t get me started on other ‘democracies’ around the world.
TO HIDE BEHIND loop holes, technicalities, formalities, red tape, legislation, correct procedure, PETTY BEAURACRACY etc..IN FEAR OF WHAT WAS A CLEAR CUT ISSUE EVERY TIME that could have been resolved from the get go by following through with objective, duty bound decisive action instead of letting the issues to become personal, ego oriented, ignorance beset and bent to work place peer pressure and thus becoming completely blown out of proportion and ballsed up IS ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLY INCOMPETANT.
ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE LIKE JACK WHO TAKE IT TO THE SYSTEM AND UTILIZE ALL FORMAL CHANNELS CORRECTLY SHOW THE SYSTEM UP FOR WHAT IT IS - A COMPLETE DOG EAT DOG CIRCUS OF MACHO ONE UP MAN SHIP & EGO MASTURBATION.
Whom? | August 6th, 2006 at 9:05 pm

———————————————————————————————————————–

“even if Jack has embellished to fill in gaps”

Absolutely no embellishment on my part Whom?, in fact, for brevities sake, I left a heap of stuff out.

When scud and co read Whom’s? first post I’ll bet they blurted out , ‘Who the fuck are these Cullum and Black jokers he’s going on about?’

“you cannot deny that people like Britton are a m m mm mmm mental menace and that the police have repeatedly failed to assist Jack after different individual police made the issue personal and closed ranks like a scared bunch of red neck dimwits.”

That’s the crux of the matter right there, exactly right except that the cops also used said mongrels to further inflame already dangerous situations. An example being Senior Sergeant Neville Haggarts acting as Agent Provocateur to “test my reaction”.

Jack | August 7th, 2006

———————————————————————————————————————–

Yeah I was more using the embellishing thing to point out one of the various weak, un true things your detractors on here have tried unsuccessfully to use against you.

I don’t think you embellished anywhere any time.

Haggart acting in an absolutely un professional & provoking manner - exactly I didn’t even really get into specifics about the sordid relationship that the local swine had with the local psych case thug.

I mean this whole thing - issue after issue, where do you start?

I tried to be admittedly general in attacking the original problem and then the un empathetic attitudes of your detractors on here which I feel are just as shameful as the original problems with the police/local red necks as they indirectly condone it by not acknowledging there’s a gross miscarriage of justice.

You just come away with the impression that they all (cops, Britton etc…) sit around at Britton’s at night sharing a crate and a cone trying to utilise their depleted grey matter to come up with some scenario in which you will crack.

Its sick, its childish, its rural policing for you.

Knowing someone through the final bastions of ‘good bloke’ territory i.e. the pub or rugby team or stock sales yards and supporting them on those grounds is more important than aiding someone who comes to you with irrefutable evidence that so called ‘good bloke’ is in fact a degenerate potential psychopath seems to be the case here.

Pretty typical good ole boys club thing going on here.

Someone should round them all up and assimilate them into the staff of some American deep south local ’sheerifs’ where they really could live out all their sick, violent and depraved fantasies without restraint.

Whom? | August 7th, 2006

« 36 LOOSE LIPS SINK SHIPS | Home | 38 LINKS »

303 Responses to “37 FEEDBACK bruiser you liar”

jerkinabox you are a total fucking idiot. fabricating stories to make the police force look incompetent. you WILL get your pay back when you least expect it.

Phantom | September 3rd, 2006 at 1:39 pm
Are you threatening me Phantom?

Jack | September 3rd, 2006 at 4:04 pm
I always wanted a phantom skull ring when I was a kid. Best I had was a half inch galvanised nut with a drawimng on it. But it left a mark when I hit someone with it and left Nothing but trouble for me.

herman | September 4th, 2006 at 2:34 pm
And the Winner Of The Day Award goes to: Phantom.

Psychotic rage: check.

Completely off track and ignorant of information clearly and precisely presented to them: check.

Indirectly threatening violence because they dont have the balls to stand up and say what they believe in: check.

Here have a Big Winner badge and Big Winner trucker hat.

Whom? | September 6th, 2006 at 9:16 pm
This dozy Phantom ape also filled in its correct email address. lol

Jack | September 7th, 2006 at 6:59 am
Fuck you are such an ignorant dogs cock sucking fukwit Jack.

Yr little vandetta against the police is so pathetic it makes you look like a fuckin arsewiping jerk.

You are trying to paint the whole force as corrupt, when there a only a few that are questionable.

Did you try pickup a constable only to be arrested for prostitution?

You make up details to suit your own ends and hope to fuck we are all gullible to listen to you.

Take your hand out of the sheeps arse and get a grip on the real world.

If you don’t want trouble with the cops, be law abiding!!!

And follow proper procedures as I have if u find a corrupt cunt, and you will get somewhere.

Don’t go making out the whole force is corrupt.

jerkinapoohole | October 1st, 2006 at 10:28 am
Please refer to Whom?’s wise words above jerkinapoohole.

PS: Did the little movie hit the spot Phanty?

Jack | October 1st, 2006 at 12:02 pm
I’m sure the NZ Police are pleased to have you on their side jerkinapoohole

DPB | October 1st, 2006 at 7:35 pm
Fuck jack yr such and ignorant dogs cock that you twist yr so called facts around to suit yr own ends.
When will condom drinking fuckwits like you actually take yr hand off your pea-sized cock and stop licking the horses arse.

You take wee bits out of stories and twist them to make yrself look right.

I note, you never have any good words to say about the police, especially with the wheel rim incident turning it around and putting blame on the cops. What a fuckin fuckwit.

Who in their right mind would throw a wheel rim at another person let alone a cop? A retarted family member of yours?

You stupid fuckin dumb sheep shit licking cock sucker.

jerkinapoohole | October 3rd, 2006 at 6:35 am
“You take wee bits out of stories and twist them to make yrself look right.”

Prove it jerk.

Jack | October 3rd, 2006 at 6:37 am
Have you ever tried to take a case against the Police,it is impossible to do so.
Not all, but a few are the biggest liars this side of the black stump
Anon

anon | October 3rd, 2006 at 11:00 am
Excllent site Jack - keep up the good work

anon | October 11th, 2006 at 5:45 pm
Thank God there is someone out there collating the atrocious behaviour of the smurfs. The NZ police are, as a whole, a laughable bunch of no-hopers.

Thank you Jack.

The problems stem from the top. When you have a self admitted thief make it to second in command you have to wonder about the innate lawfulness of the rest of them.

Andrew

Andrew | November 14th, 2006 at 6:14 pm
Jack - what’s going on? Why are all recent posts to do with the Kearns case being deleted, including the ones from Jane and myself here today?
If you are wanting to delete them all you’ve missed some from Lizzie in “Good Cops”

Another Anon | November 20th, 2006 at 5:11 pm
Did I say something wrong Jack? Its not like its just that case, everything on the thread has been deleted.

Jane | November 20th, 2006 at 8:55 pm
Bit of a tidy up Jane. The cases that were finalised were moved to the appropriate pages. I’ve enabled comments if you want to comment on the Kearns matter.

Jack | November 21st, 2006 at 4:44 am
Cheers Jack, was wondering what was happening there too.

Juiceylips | November 21st, 2006 at 8:09 am
“Bit of a tidy up Jane” Thank goodness. Was begining to worry you’d bowed to pressure from the cops to remove them or something insane like that!

Another Anon | November 21st, 2006 at 5:18 pm
Here is an idea.

Let all the cops take a week off. No cops working at all.

Lets see how long it would take you loosers to start jumping up and down wanting them back at work.

Tossers

Donk | November 23rd, 2006 at 2:31 pm
Hello Donk, how’s things at Paremoremo?

Jack | November 23rd, 2006 at 6:05 pm
Just peachy thanx.

Donk | November 26th, 2006 at 7:57 pm
Reads like another case I’v looked at (Police vs Vicki Robyn Storey). The Womble Brigate lied, covered up, colluded with co-conspirators and tried every trick in the book to villafy the accused. Trouble was the lying got the cops in the end. It cost the cops thousands in compensation, all because of a fuck-up in basic police proceedure which, if the cop on Great Barrier Island had have followed, would have saved a lot of trouble all round. Its amazing how the fuzz think they can do whatever, only to end up tying their silly excuses into orchestrated litanies of lies, costing their hard working and dedicated collegues a lot in reputation, and costing innocent folk a lot of embarrassment, time, money and even freedom. For the record, people like ThePhantom and Jerkmeinapoohole are the very reason that sites like this exist. Its that kind of fucked-up thinking thats caused all the trouble.

pricey1267 | December 30th, 2006 at 9:25 pm
“if the cop on Great Barrier Island had have followed,”

Would that cop have been Cullum McGillivray pricey?

Jack | December 31st, 2006 at 5:39 am
Howd ya guess, Jack??? I’m sure he’s got his fingers in too many pies over there, meaning justice is bought, not given. Wonder how much smoke he put up during the Frey-Hershey murder???

pricey1267 | December 31st, 2006 at 9:01 am
Small towns have two types of cops. Those that police the area then go home, and those that get involved with the movers and shakers of the town, shutting out reason when its neaded the most in order to sattisfy their mates.

pricey1267 | December 31st, 2006 at 9:03 am
That CUNT McGillivray tried his best to nail me in Wanganui but got nothing for his efforts. He tranferred to Gt Barrier shortly after. He gets a mention in 25 Rogues Gallery and a few other places on this site and is one of the prime reasons I started this site.

Jack | December 31st, 2006 at 9:57 am
Goodness gracious!

scud | January 8th, 2007 at 12:12 am
Thumbs up to Cullum. Without him we wouldn’t have this splended site of fictional illiteracy to look at.

donk | January 15th, 2007 at 2:06 pm
No fiction on this site donk, not from me anyhoo, and McGillivray QSM, sullied for all time, that ignorant, arrogant, failed farmer loser was only one of the reasons I started this. You should thank Haggart, Baker and Gary Smith too. Them and all the rest of the mongrel cops who hurt my delicate sensibilities.lol

Jack | January 15th, 2007 at 3:04 pm
I see you’ve closed comments to most of your site so this is about the cop that was caught speeding recently in passing parade. You wrote that he “has been found guilty of speeding but discharged without conviction” So that’s it? There are no real repercussions for his speeding?

Another Anon | January 28th, 2007 at 8:55 pm
Bloody spammer’s been bombarding me with porn and other stuff Another Anon.

At least the judge found the speeding cop guilty. A few years back an Assistant Commissioner’s (White or Wright) son, also a cop, was let off by a judge who said it was ok for him to do 187kph? in a 50k area because he was on the way to a non injury accident.

Jack | January 29th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
Hmmmm, I wonder who’s bombarding you with spam …. A couple of names spring to mind - or are they the same person LOL!

Another Anon | January 29th, 2007 at 10:17 pm
Hey Good on ya for uncovering all this. There is one particular story from a couple of years ago I’d love to get uncovered.. Email Me
Cops here are crooked as hell and its not until you’ve been screwed by them that you can fully understand what goes on in the background.

WWBBD? | February 7th, 2007 at 9:48 pm
Havnt heard from you, Jack, for over a week… what’s been happening, mate? Just hope the bent blue line hasnt pulled the wool over the eyes of the real cops and done the dirty on you. If they have, It will only prove, beyond all reasonable doubt, everything here… like that needs to happen.

pricey1267 | February 14th, 2007 at 5:43 pm
Nothing so dramatic pricey, just on forced leave, wink wink. Be back
guns blazing in three weeks. Cheers Jack.

Jack | February 14th, 2007 at 6:39 pm
I think I will feel at home on this site. I know good cops, and I know bad . I help good cops and I fight with bad cops . I detest corruption and lying/thug cops . Kiwiland don’t need bent cops , we need good cops and community working together, so the kids are safe .

dad4justice | February 15th, 2007 at 8:46 pm
Spread the word dad4justice.

Jack | February 16th, 2007 at 6:30 am
Hi, Just read the link labelled five miscariages of justice. I note that the “DOCTOR” hasn’t put his name to the peace. would love to know who it is.

donk | February 17th, 2007 at 11:34 am
Looks like the spammer’s back again Jack.

Juiceylips | February 21st, 2007 at 12:30 pm
That’s him gone Trev.

Jack | February 21st, 2007 at 2:40 pm
Again, ???. Who’s Trev?

Juiceylips | February 21st, 2007 at 3:04 pm
flabbylips or whatever your name is I’m not a spammer am i jack.

donk | February 21st, 2007 at 3:46 pm
Donk, there was some weird spam that came in in the post after yours, like a long weblink.
Jack has now deleted it. I wasn’t refering to you or your post as it had nothing to do with either.

Juiceylips | February 21st, 2007 at 3:52 pm
Hey donk, any corruption in your can?

Jack | February 21st, 2007 at 5:16 pm
What’s the legal definition of intimidation?

Jack | February 23rd, 2007 at 12:10 pm
Check out this site for some general info Jack:
http://www.privacy.org.nz/library/harassment-and-criminal-associations

Juiceylips | February 23rd, 2007 at 1:03 pm
When’s you ban at SC lifted Jack? It’s just not the same without you there.

Juiceylips | February 27th, 2007 at 2:51 pm
Who are you on SC Juicy?

Jack | February 27th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
Not on there yet. Haven’t been proactive about getting enough points to post, although not long to go I hope. But I enjoy reading your posts.

Juiceylips | February 27th, 2007 at 3:05 pm
I’ve got six days to go Juicy, I guess my regular detractors will
reappear then also. lol
Have a look in Comments Home Invasion guns. One of the cops from 1984,
Home invasion drugs has added his views.

Jack | February 27th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
Interesting. I like how he tells you to move on, while he’s still bringing up the issue too…

Juiceylips | February 27th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Good work matey. I hear everyone saying “its only one side of the story” probably the Callums and Blacks of the world “don no whut to do with that thar contraption” regarding their side of the story. Sucks you’ve been getting a raw deal from the local constabulary. Keep it up

Steve | March 7th, 2007 at 1:11 pm
Cheers Steve.

Jack | March 8th, 2007 at 4:22 am
Any way we can have a chatroom on potential bent cops?

I have a story to be told about a Senior Sergeant (ex police dog handler that has had two civil claims against him. One resulted in a settlement out of court and one that the judge found in favour of the sergeant due to creditability. I also know of a law report with similar offending by the sergeant. I was wondering if I could publish and see if anyone else comes forward. Your comments would be appreciated.

earthmonkee | March 8th, 2007 at 5:48 pm
The chief executive of the Department of Corrections, Barry Matthews, has told State Services Commissioner Mark Prebble he regrets saying “there is no blood on my hands” when he was asked at a press conference about the murder committed by Graeme Burton.

Burton, a convicted murderer, was released from prison on parole and during his six months of freedom he killed Karl Kuchenbecker.

The National Party criticised Mr Matthews for making the comment, saying it was insensitive and amounted to a refusal to accept any responsibility.

The party’s corrections spokesman, Simon Power, wrote to Dr Prebble yesterday asking whether the comment was “appropriate behaviour” from a public sector chief executive.

In his response to Mr Power, released today, Dr Prebble said he had discussed the comment with Mr Matthews.

“He tells me he made a mistake in his response to a question from a journalist,” Dr Prebble said in his letter to Mr Power.

“The journalist put a quotable line to him, and he made the mistake, in the heat of the moment, of repeating that line back to the journalist.

“Barry regrets the comment very much.”

Dr Prebble went on to assure Mr Power that Mr Matthews, and other public servants involved, were “acutely aware of the appalling nature of this tragedy” and were determined to make improvements to reduce the risk of such events happening again.

- NZPA

pricey1267 | March 9th, 2007 at 6:55 pm
I know of narcs getting off on perjury charges as well as rape investigations getting buggered up if the gang member will ‘assist the police’ with apparently more serious inquiries like tracking down pot plantations. Dirtiest force on the planet as the middle class has no idea.

anon | March 15th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
In my nearly daily dealings with the NZ Police I have never detected a hint of anything other than professionalism… perhaps I am one of the lucky few who seems to only deal with the good ones a? Even when I’m on the receiving end (eg: flat mates being drunken yobs). Interesting read this site although I have to say I’m not entirely convinced that everything that is presented is as it seems, but I respect your right to voice your opinions. Good luck.

King | March 16th, 2007 at 12:07 am
Thank you King, there are plenty of folk who haven’t come across a rubbish cop, I hope your luck continues. PS you certainly changed your tune since writing post 62 or was it one of your drunken flatmates who done that? lol

Jack | March 16th, 2007 at 5:43 am
Good on you Jack - in my personal experience the boys in blue are a bunch of lying wankers - in Nelson Bays the “tomcat” culture is well alive with Police cars being used as sex aides - makes me wanna puke.

anon | March 16th, 2007 at 6:26 am
Pardon Jack? I didn’t post number 62, I only came across this an hour or so before I placed feedback through a link on a blog. One of my flatmate’s could have posted it I guess, but I doubt that.

King | March 16th, 2007 at 9:09 am
Bit of a curly one King, my email thingy shows post 62 and 63 came from the same source. Never mind, not worth getting in a tiz over, cheers King.

Jack | March 16th, 2007 at 10:19 am
Hiya Jack, How are you,. yougutless fucking wonder. Just an observation fuckwit, but I notice you’ve removed my three posts ( and presumably will this one), no doubt because they don’t suit your twisted perverted argument. All I can say cuntface, is I hope you get the living shit kicked out of you - FUCKWIT

dbrent | March 18th, 2007 at 10:30 am
If I remember rightly dbrent, your two deleted posts were nothing but abuse directed at other contributors, one of them wandering_sloth and not me or my site. Say something ‘normal’ and I promise I won’t delete it. And post up your real name and hometown pottymouth, prove to me you’re not a hypocritical ‘gutless wonder’.

Jack | March 18th, 2007 at 11:14 am
Go screw yourself homo, better still go screw slothy, he’s into that shit

dbrent | March 19th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
Wrestling with some demons are you brent?

Jack | March 19th, 2007 at 4:17 pm
Does anyone knows anything about www.dodgycopsnz.blogspot.com - I want to join it and need an invite?? I’ve been sent this address anonymously as a journalist and am keen to find out more. Thanks!

journogirn | March 21st, 2007 at 11:32 am
Good work jack.There’s no smoke without fire and from reading your site i’d say the crooked blue line needs an insurance asseser not the firebrigade.It took ppl like you to expose the corruption in the police force of qld..hell those jokers make our lot look like saints.I lived in australia and the coppers there were so bent they couldnt lie straight in bed.It takes ppl like you jack,ppl who are prepared to put up. Keep up the good work.It took yrs of ppl like you to bring the truth out in Queensland im sure if more ppl speak out we might find out how far the rot goes here. Anyway all the best and keep it up.Good bloody onya

muzz | March 26th, 2007 at 5:51 pm
I want to join the dodgy cops site as well how do you do this.

Paula | March 26th, 2007 at 7:22 pm
Thank’s muzz.

Jack | March 26th, 2007 at 7:56 pm
Jack I saw on one of the posts that you deleted claiming that you are a pedophile? Is this just hate banter towards you or is it true?

Macca | March 28th, 2007 at 12:38 am
Hehehe macca I’m glad my site pisses you off so much.

Jack | March 28th, 2007 at 4:44 am
Have a look in Comments, Home Invasion (drugs) Macca. LMFAO

Jack | March 28th, 2007 at 5:34 pm
Hi

I would be interested to hear from anyone that has been falsely accused of rape and won their cases, especially those in the Christchurch area who have been atrociously treated.
Also interested in anyone experiencing first hand incompetent treatment and poor investigative techniques by the Papanui sexual abuse unit.
Please email me on
swingingpendulum@hotmail.com
I have at least 3-4 cases and am interested in othes that may be appropriate to add to my story. Would be very interested if the same police and prosecutors keep turning up and if there is a pattern to these investigation.

Fighting for justice | April 9th, 2007 at 4:27 pm
Thanks juicylips.

Jack | May 3rd, 2007 at 5:12 pm
You’re very welcome Jack.

Juiceylips | May 4th, 2007 at 9:43 am
watch you’re back jack

P | May 18th, 2007 at 10:17 am
Is that a misspelt threat or a warning P?

Jack | May 18th, 2007 at 10:40 am
Well once again our crooked blue line has been sprung..This latest allegations of coppers watching bestiality movies shows what a sick depraved lying bunch of wankers they are.That private investigater in dunedin must have them scared.No smoke without fire.I recon its about time for a royal commission into the police force and and the govt.CORRUPTION STARTS AT THE TOP.

muzz | May 19th, 2007 at 6:59 pm
re #84, Muzz is obviously referring to the Investigate article which the mainstream media has all but ignored after that initial flurry over man v beast.

MEDIA RELEASE FROM INVESTIGATE MAGAZINE

EMBARGOED TO MIDDAY SUNDAY MAY 13 2007

POLICE COMMISSIONER LIES TO PUBLIC ABOUT BESTIALITY VIDEO SCREENED IN HIS HOUSE

Police Commissioner Howard Broad has watched bestiality videos at his house with his fellow police officers and groped other female staff while stationed in Dunedin , reveals the latest issue of Investigate magazine in an unprecedented special report.

The allegations, by some of Broad’s former colleagues, are likely to see the Police Commissioner step down, and represent the tip of the iceberg in a massive investigation of police corruption and misconduct by Investigate magazine.

In this morning’s Herald on Sunday newspaper, Broad admits a bestiality video was screened at a party in his house but denies knowing about it until later in the evening.

“Later on in the night someone played a pornographic film. It was reported to me. I didn’t see it. Later on it was reported to me as a film of the type you are talking about. It was in my private house,” Broad told the paper.

Broad told the Herald on Sunday he was adamant he was not in the lounge at the time the film was played and did not even see the rugby films played that evening.

“I was in the kitchen talking to people. When I found out about it I was annoyed and irritated but there wasnt anything I could do,” he told the paper.

On that basis, says the newspaper, Broad continues to have the confidence of Police Minister Annette King and Prime Minister Helen Clark.

However, Investigate can confirm that the real sequence of events contrasts sharply with what he has told the public. A former police colleague of Broad’s is prepared to testify on oath to a Royal Commission that:

“He was there, reveling in the video. He loved it. I was standing with him. The video also featured a pig, and the actors appeared to me to be mentally handicapped. Broad was laughing.”

Magazine editor Ian Wishart says Broad appears to be doing a Bill Clinton.

“To suggest he didn’t see the bestiality video and was unaware of it is a lie that has about as much credibility as Bill Clinton’s admission that he used to smoke marijuana joints ‘but I didn’t inhale’.”

Bestiality videos were (and remain) prohibited objectionable material and their screening is illegal.

Wishart says the magazine’s two year inquiry has pinpointed Dunedin and Christchurch as the hub of police corruption in New Zealand, with officers engaged in organised crime, drugs, rape, extortion, underage sex, kidnapping and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

“Some of the key figures in the corruption allegations were senior detectives on the David Bain case,” Wishart confirmed today, “and we are breaking major new ground on that case as a result.”

The devastating allegations, based on taped statements made by victims and on magazine interviews with witnesses willing to testify to a Royal Commission of Inquiry, also drag in no fewer than six Government MPs, including Attorney-General Michael Cullen, Social Development Minister David Benson-Pope and one of Helen Clark’s closest advisors, Pete Hodgson.

The magazine alleges Cullen and Benson-Pope helped police cover-up details of an alleged pedophile, bestiality and bondage and discipline ring in
Dunedin in the 1980s, while the other MPs were aware of major corruption allegations about Dunedin Police in 2000, but failed to launch any proper investigation.

Wishart adds that Howard Broad’s admission that bestiality videos were screening adds credence to some of the other specific allegations about bestiality in Dunedin, which are specified in the magazine out today.

The following major allegations are contained in a 17 page special investigation in the June issue of Investigate magazine, the result of two years of background inquiries and six weeks of intensive investigation:

1. That current Police Commissioner Howard Broad had, and was watching, bestiality videos at his going away party from the Dunedin CIB at
19 Arawa St

2. That current Police Commissioner Howard Broad fondled junior staff whilst stationed at the Dunedin CIB

3. That Howard Broad, when he stated that only a “few” officers were involved in sexual misconduct, either knew or should have known of the extensive sexual misconduct in the Dunedin CIB

4. That Police National Headquarters, Dunedin Police and the Labour Government helped quash an investigation into a child sex, bondage and bestiality ring operating in Dunedin n 1984 run by the father of a police officer and attended by at least one Labour cabinet minister

5. That current Attorney-General Michael Cullen and the current Minister responsible for CYFS, David Benson-Pope, helped run damage control over the child sex, bondage and bestiality case in 1985

6. That current Labour coalition MPs Pete Hodgson, Tim Barnett, George Hawkins and Matt Robson were aware of major allegations of police misconduct from 2000 onwards, including the existence of videotapes of police rapes and bestiality involving police officers

7. That by failing to rein in police corruption brought to their attention in the eighties and again in 2000, the Labour government has permitted the culture of corruption to widen in that time, wrecking more lives

8. That former Wellington District Commander and current Police National Headquarters officer, Superintendent John Kelly indecently assaulted a number of women, including the daughter of a previous police commissioner

9. That Dunedin and Christchurch Police had arrangements to turn a blind eye to organised crime – including underage sex and drug dealing - in return for sexual favours from brothels

10. That police have maintained files on key politicians and public figures capable of being used to blackmail the government, judges, lobby groups and even police association members into supporting the status quo

11. That Dunedin police officers, former and current, have been involved in multiple rapes of junior female police staff, prostitutes and civilians, drug deals, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, including falsifying charges

12. That several of the top officers in the David Bain case, including Milton Weir, were allegedly corrupt police officers

13. That the officer involved in the alleged rape of a court worker, detailed in our last issue and cleared by Police National Headquarters last month, is also a corrupt officer

14. That the culture of police corruption, far from being localised to the Bay of Plenty or historic, extends to a large number of jurisdictions because of staff movements, and continues to the present day

15. That the only way to weed the bad cops out of the force is a Royal Commission, because the Old Boys Network within the police is currently looking after its own interests and bringing discredit to the many hardworking honest police who do not have the institutional power to bring change

Investigate has been shown the names and specific allegations about a large number of current and former police officers alleged to have been involved in multiple rapes, drug deals, extortion, perversion of the course of justice, sexual misconduct, abuse of power, bringing the police into disrepute, abduction and kidnapping, fraud and a range of other crimes. Multiple police districts and National Headquarters are involved. There is far, far more than we have published in this major investigation.

The magazine is calling for an immediate, full Royal Commission of Inquiry into the performance of the New Zealand Police, with wide terms of reference and full powers to subpoena, compel and take evidence on oath. Our informants do not believe the police have sufficient integrity to investigate these allegations against senior officers, and no other independent law enforcement agency exists capable of investigating the police.

Posted by iwishart on May 13, 2007 | Permalink

Heavy stuff i say!

Anon | May 24th, 2007 at 11:59 pm
This sounds remarkably like queensland victoria and new south wales back in the 80’s and 90’s.I whole hneartedly agree with annon.Heavy stuff indeed . As long as we have corrupt polliticians and police running the show we have no chance.If nothing get done about these allegations what hope does this country have?….I dont know about you but at the moment the ppl of nz should be as nervous as a chook or a pig at a dunedin police party. Irecon a royal commission into police is needed,but let not stop there.as i said bfore…CORRUPTION STARTS AT THE TOP. A royal commission into the police and certain labour pollitians is long overdue.

muzz | May 25th, 2007 at 6:18 pm
COMMENT:

Surely it is time for the establishment of a Permanent & genuinely Independent Anti Corruption Commission tasked with investigating & prosecuting corrupt agents of the state?

The following article suggets that that time is now!

Tuesday, 29 May 2007
PCA won’t investigate latest police claims

The Police Complaints Authority (PCA) has said it will not investigate the claims of police corruption and criminal behaviour by serving and past police officers published in Investigate magazine.

Earlier this month the magazine published the article “To Serve and Protect - The Devastating Truth about Police Corruption in New Zealand.” It made a large number of allegations about a range of Dunedin police officers, including corruption, drug-taking, rape, child-sex rings, orgies and killing cats.

Amongst the allegations was that Police Commissioner Howard Broad watched a bestiality video at his house with other police officers in 1981.

The commissioner has admitted the pornographic film was shown at a party in his Dunedin house without his prior knowledge and permission. He said he was elsewhere in the house when the movie was shown.

Mr Broad subsequently referred the allegations to the PCA.

PCA head Justice Lowell Goddard said none of the allegations required investigation or other action by the Authority.

She said it was up to the police to make inquiries as they saw fit.

Anonagain | May 29th, 2007 at 11:44 am
re #87, yet again the P.C.A - a.k.a ‘Performance Consistently Atrocious’ is shown up for the lame duck that it is.

Simian | June 1st, 2007 at 7:11 pm
Where do they dig up these ‘Consistently Atrocious’ PCA judges Simian?

Jack | June 2nd, 2007 at 6:22 am
Bit quiet of late Jack,the Investigate thing seems to have lulled, amazing the
power over the press ‘they’ wield.

I think the answer to the P.C.A question is firstly

1. a member of the ‘old boys club’

I am sure we can add to this list…

Simian | June 2nd, 2007 at 11:23 pm
On 29 March, in a letter to the detective in charge of the case, I informed him that I had a tape recording of some threats being made against me.
On the 26 May I got a reply letter from the detective that stated, “This is obviously of significance to my investigation and could have sped up the matter significantly and eliminated any possible manipulation of the incident by those involved.” (Give `em some rope and watch what happens, aye Simian?.)

Note mister speedy investigator had taken nearly TWO months to open my letter in which I had repeated the threatening words in transcript form (just like I did in all my earlier letters of complaint) and added “A voice transcript if you haven’t sussed that out already.” Calls himself a detective. lol

The detective then went on to say, “As you can appreciate, should the recording sufficiently disclose an offence that Mr Poynter denies, then this information could change the outcome of this investigation and may lead to a more serious charge.

IE: Poynter has made a false statement of denial to Police, that in their opinion is more serious than the dire threats uttered to me.

In the 26 March letter from the detective he also stated, “I have since discovered an independent witness, who may be able to shed some light on this matter.”

Back to the May 26 letter,

“Any witness statements obtained by the Police may also be subject to review and possible criminal liability.”

IE: The “independent witness” has knowingly made a false statement to Police backing up Poynter’s false denials.

Now we are into the area of attempting to pervert the course of justice. Shit creek?

Jack | June 3rd, 2007 at 9:30 am
yes, give them enough rope & they hang themselves every time..be interesting to get hold of the statement of the so called ‘independent witness’.

How long is a pretty basic sort of investigation such as this one going to take them?

Yes, seems like a trip down the ‘attempting to pervert the course of justice, fabrication of evidence river’ for your adversary & his friend.

Yet again, the benefits of technology-video,audio etc are shown to prevail over the lies of the pretenders.

Great stuff Jack, you will have to start putting up Bruiser et als I.P address so that there can be no doubts as to his & his other associate’s right wing corrupt authoritarian leanings.

Simian http://threesimians1.blogspot.com/

Simian | June 3rd, 2007 at 3:08 pm
I’ve ask for both the offender’s and his ‘independent witnesses’ statements via the Official Information Act but thus far Mr Plod has refused to provide them to me. Bit of a cover-up in progress I’m picking. They’d better not “lose” those statements. I’ll be fucking ropable if they try that caper again.

Bruiser and co seem to have a different IP address eack time they post Simian so I don’t know if it would be of any use to post em up?

Jack | June 3rd, 2007 at 4:35 pm
the old ‘misplaced file trick’, an oldy but not such a goodie when you’re on the receiving end of it.

Hopefully we can all see scans of the end result when it eventually happens-you may be going down the private prosecution route…although arguably that is their job but the police seem to have ’situational powers of arrest’ as to if & when it suits their agenda.

Greg & his boys must move between different workstations at ‘Bullshit Castle’ a.k.a police national headquarters.

Simian | June 3rd, 2007 at 9:28 pm
It will be certain Wanganui cops who will be in the dock if they lose any documents or fail to proceed if a case of conspiracy or attempting pervert the course of justice is exposed.

Is Briuser Greg who at where?

Jack | June 4th, 2007 at 7:25 am
some of Bruiser’s statements are part parrotings of Greg Oconnor’s (police association president) press releases.

‘Bullshit Castle’ is what the informal police organization calls the office of the commissioner.

Simian | June 4th, 2007 at 11:38 pm
lala73 on corruption and credibility.

102. Corruption starts at the top
I personally know of a guy that the n.z police targeted in a drug set-up, in which a police officer consumed marijuana and attempted to get their ‘target’ to smoke the marijuana too. The police denied that the set-up ever happened, despite there being proof…….. Which begs the question…..was this an unauthorized & corrupt use of police powers…..where did the marijuana come from….. & why was that police officer smoking the marijuana?……….. Have a look at this site below and download the audio file & hear it all for yourself…then decide if it happened or not…………….. http://threesimians1.blogspot.com/

mister_tee (new) 3:56 pm, 8 Jun
—————————————————————————

103. #102
That website is among the most biased and uncredible sites around. The heading to that taped recording says “listen to Inspector Kerry Watson- New Zealand Police, confirm a corrupt drugs set-up by Constable Sharyn Sain-Tumataroa”. Um well i listened to the coversation, and there is no admissions of any drugs set up. Kerry watson (not that anyone can verify its him talking) does not have any knowledge of the supposed drug smoking as he wasn’t there. Typically these conspiracy types who create their sites, skew something to try and fit their ideal.

lala73 (450 ) 5:08 pm, 8 Jun
—————————————————————————

104. And i’ve looked at the bentcops website too.
wow, theres some real credibility, not. The deluded ramblings of someone who feels the whole worlds against him and who won’t accept responsibility for HIS own actions. lawdy lawdy lawdy

lala73 5:20 pm, 8 Jun
—————————————————————————

105. #94
“the CIB will quite often go after the wrong person and arrange the evidence to fit” Quite often, really? that’s a lofty statement to make. If it happens quite often, that would suggest that quite alot of police are corrupt. Quite alot of 9 odd thousand means thousands of corrupt cops. And as for Thomas, Bain and Watson cases. Hate to point out that these three did the crimes, and are therefore doing the time. The website for free scottwatson is hardly an unbiased or credible website to refer to either. If you were to refer me to a website that took both sides of the story and presented them, then that would be intelligent. What is not, is referring to a website created solely for blaming police corruption as this does not present a fair representation of anything.

lala73

Jack | June 9th, 2007 at 7:44 am
If I was a female lala, would you call me a nutty slut?

Jack | June 9th, 2007 at 7:50 am
interesting bit of debate, Jacko…got a pic of lala,who is obviously on the smurf payroll like #97 Rooster-Turkey too.

Simian | June 9th, 2007 at 1:03 pm
Yeah good stuff alright Simian. Email me her pic and I’ll post it up, I’d like to see what she looks like. Who let the dog out? lol

Jack | June 9th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
Lala?…sounds like thats where she lives.Obviously your starting to touch a few raw nerves.keep the pressure up and keep up the good work. Turn the heat up high enough and sumthin will give boil over. Great site ad keep up the good work…GOOD BLOODY ONYA….CHEERS

muzz | June 11th, 2007 at 7:42 pm
Hey Jack - is it possible to get copies of district court transcripts and if so, how do I go about that?

Another Anon | June 11th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
#107 think youll have to apply to the Court, send a letter to the registrar in the first instance,or front in person to the Court public counter, keep a paper trail, they may even charge you for it, best
to get onto it b4 theyre ‘lost’ especially if controversial. You may not be able to access everyone elses but should be entitled to a transcript of your own evidence…at a price probably.

Anon | June 12th, 2007 at 12:00 am
I see Debbie Gerbich 1xed herself..sad, I noticed she was taken to task by some of the more right wing papers….shame she didnt post her movie on the net to stick it to them good….any thoughts on that one?

Anon | June 12th, 2007 at 12:03 am
Another Anon

This is what I write to the body concerned, “Please forward to me at the below address copies of all the documents I am entitled to concerning (whatever). I finish with, “This request is made pursuant to the Official Information Act 1982.”

If they refuse to supply or take more than 20 days to respond, a complaint to the Ombudsman is in order. What Anon said is good too except you can get other peoples stuff too. Sometimes you can read blacked out information if you hold the paper up to the light just right. LOL Good luck.

Jack | June 12th, 2007 at 6:35 am
Thanks muzz, will do.

Jack | June 12th, 2007 at 6:37 am
If I said, “Dark Forces” hastened Debbie Gerbich’s demise I’d be labeled a conspiracy nut so I won’t.

Jack | June 12th, 2007 at 6:41 am
Cheers Anon and Jack. Will give that a go.

Another Anon | June 12th, 2007 at 6:21 pm
i have a suggestion..lets have an independant royal commission into the police force. a good candidate for the job would be the bloke who investigated the bent coppers in queensland.if the cops have nothing to hide..whats the problem?..the only problem we have in nz is cops investigateing cops..they used to do that in australia ..but the royal commissions in qld nsw and victoria proved how flawed that system is..
the only reason i could see anyone objecting to this the people who have something to hide…makes ya wonder doesnt it

muzz | June 13th, 2007 at 10:07 pm
re #114- Great suggestion Muzz, the corrupt ones are currently hiding behind the existing power structures which have effectively removed any accountability for these bastards!

Also politically, we changed from F.P.P- 1st past the post to M.M.P-why cant we change our legal system from an adversarial to an inquisitorial. Currently, if you have the $$ & the power you win..

Simian | June 14th, 2007 at 2:20 pm
G’DAY JACK..i think you might be right about scud…he didnt like my suggestion of a royal commission lol..no suprises there eh?..this was his reply….77…..And who would you like to investigate
the Police? Of more interest to me is where would these people get the necessary invesigative experience to do it? I imagine ex cops, and I can further imagine that all you nutters would be dead against that too..

scud103
my response was to point out what i said..he got real silly then..
hey scud..are you thick or what?..i said in my post…how about the bloke that investigated the corruption in queensland..he was a qc..and x cops wouldnt be smart..how about someone not associated with the police force..even someone from australia . those blokes proved the coppers were corrupt..wake up..x cops investigateing cops?..hell thats no better than what we got now..IL SPELL IT OUT IN CAPS SCUD…SOMEONE WHO HAS NO CONNECTIONS WHATSOEVER TO THE POLICE SHOULD DO THE INVESTIGATEING..that way it will be totally impartial…dont like that idea?..if they got nuthing to hide they got no worries…or have they?
but then when i point out the obvious he resorts to trivia…shows he’s starting to get worried
Yeah wolfie, I am kinda thick….
you wanna join my club? You fit the criteria very well…
This joker sounds like he must have something to hide lol…..

muzz | June 14th, 2007 at 5:10 pm
You’ll never get anywhere arguing with scud muzz, he’s one of the nut and slut brigade, best to ignore him altogether.

Jack | June 14th, 2007 at 6:33 pm
ok jack…..i will…

muzz | June 14th, 2007 at 8:13 pm
tut tut Jacko, where do you get your info? lol

scud | June 14th, 2007 at 11:47 pm
I see the medication hasn’t help you at all…I will be sure to keep you up to date with all my relevant posts, since you seem to care so much.

scud | June 15th, 2007 at 12:09 am
Hehehe Kim, you’ve been snapped.

“The dutch police would have had you dead and buried years ago.. scud103 (142 ) 9:15 pm, 2 Oct 06″ TradeMe Opinion.

The most abusive poster on this site thus far (scud) turns out to be one Kim Kuiper, a Papakura cop. Nice haircut Kim.

What are you going to do now Kim, contact the Dutch police?

———————————————————————————————————————————————

Remember this one Kim?

“I look upon this site with utter dispair and sadness…I may start up my own web site ‘www.inbredwankers.com’ and you could all feature in it. Of course I would pay royalties. I hear life is cheap, maybe you could all put your pennies together and buy one….”

scud

——————————————————————————————————————————————–

UPDATE FROM MY MATE KIM/SCUD.

“I don’t know who your informant is, but they must have been a cop back in the 90’s as their information is that old. I didn’t say that I was not Kim Kuiper. I am not however a cop at Papakura and my ‘current squeeze’ is not *************. If you made proper enquiries you would find out that *********is not even a cop…she was up until about 5 years ago, my wife, having left the Police many moons ago. I would put money on the fact that she is most definately not ******…the idea is laughable.”

Jack | June 24th, 2007 at 7:18 am
What a horrid site.

N.Walker | June 24th, 2007 at 10:53 am
Horrid, that’s not a word you hear every day. lol

Jack | June 24th, 2007 at 1:37 pm
MORE OF CLOWN LAW DOING THEIR STUFF: a case of sour grapes?

Wednesday, 4 July 2007
Moodie in bankruptcy threat

Defiant lawyer Rob Moodie is being threatened with bankruptcy if he refuses to pay legal costs of nearly $50,000 to the Crown Law Office.

The cross-dressing Feilding lawyer - who wore frocks to court in a protest against the judiciary and has previously asked to be referred to as Miss Alice - says he is strapped for cash, but willing to repay the debt in weekly instalments of $10 from his national superannuation pension.

Dr Moodie, 69, said he would be forced out of practising law if he was declared bankrupt.

Under the Law Practitioners Act, bankrupt lawyers lose their practising certificate but can apply to have it reissued.

In a tersely worded letter dated June 21, a lawyer acting for Crown Law demanded payment of $49,266 in costs and disbursements owed under court orders.

The money relates to contempt proceedings taken against Dr Moodie by the solicitor-general.

Dr Moodie had published the suppressed “Butcher report” on the Internet in his fight to clear the names of King Country farmers Keith and Margaret Berryman over a fatal bridge collapse.

In February, he was found guilty of contempt, fined $5000 and suspended from practising law for three months.

His fine was paid by a supporter but he still owes thousands in outstanding costs.

The letter warned him to pay up by 4pm, June 28 or bankruptcy proceedings would be filed against him “without further notice”.

Dr Moodie said the letter was a deliberate attempt to intimidate and distract him at a critical point in the Berrymans’ case.

“I will not be intimidated in this way by the courts, by the Government or anyone else.”

Crown Law were trying to remove him from practice and leave the Berrymans without counsel, he said.

He has previously alleged a cover-up involving the courts, army and Crown Law.

A Crown Law spokeswoman refused to comment about the bankruptcy proceedings or whether the office would accept Dr Moodie’s repayment offer.

“I’m sure Dr Moodie, seeing as he’s been pretty quick coming forward to you so far, will keep you well advised.”

anony | July 9th, 2007 at 3:34 pm
WOW! cool site.

HB | July 14th, 2007 at 7:25 pm
I see you pathetic morons are still at it. I aso see there are a few more loosers buying in to your deranged fantasies Jack. Keep up the good work. always worth a giggle when im bored out of my tree.

donk | July 17th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
Hello Donk, good to hear from you. Bit of a shocker scud turning out to be a serving a cop aye.
Bye the way are you still turning the key at Pare, not stood down, suspended or sacked I hope? How about a nice pic of you and Bruiser on the job. lol

Jack | July 17th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
Looking at the picture you posted of him I can’t beleive for one minute he would be serving in this countries police force. Looks more like a german.

donk | July 18th, 2007 at 5:58 pm
On his way to a soccer match

donk | July 18th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
That was in his undercover days donk, gotta look the part.

Jack | July 18th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
heres a very interesting site which provides a perspective on another cog in the machine….time for an oil change!

http://www.kiwisfirst.com/#one-man-s-story

R Non Emuss | July 22nd, 2007 at 12:10 am
MORE OF THE ONGOING MOODIE-CROWN (CLOWN) LAW SAGA RE THE ‘BUTCHER REPORT’ RELEASED ON THE INTERNET BY DR MOODIE IN SUPPORT OF THE BERRYMAN’S BRIDGE COLLAPSE CASE:

Tuesday, 24 July 2007
Charge me too, says Moodie supporter

A man embroiled in a legal row with the Crown says his release of confidential documents has been labelled a “side issue” – when lawyer Rob Moodie was brought before the courts for doing something similar.

Canterbury man Mark Feary says he wants to be charged with contempt like Dr Moodie because it would “expose the ugliness of what is going on”.

Dr Moodie’s clients, Keith and Margaret Berryman, have written to the solicitor-general, saying the lack of action against Mr Feary and his wife, Karen, shows Dr Moodie and the Berrymans were being persecuted.

Either the Fearys should also be prosecuted for contempt, or Dr Moodie should receive compensation and an apology, the Berrymans wrote to the solicitor-general last week.

A spokesman for Crown Law, which the solicitor-general heads, declined to comment.

The Berrymans and the Fearys met more than 10 years ago. Mr Feary said yesterday that the oppressed grouped together.

The Berrymans’ fight is for a new inquest for a man who died when a bridge leading to their King Country farm collapsed in 1994, and compensation for their later legal problems and loss of their farm.

Mr Feary’s family leased a high- country farm for generations before a dispute began with the Crown in 1984, and they were denied access to the property in 1998. The couple’s battle for compensation continues.

Mr Feary paid the $5000 fine imposed on Dr Moodie when he was found guilty of contempt of court.

Dr Moodie had published an engineer’s report relating to the Berrymans’ case, having earlier accepted the terms of an agreement to keep it confidential.

Three High Court judges also found he had broken the usual rule that documents obtained from an opposing party as a result of court proceedings could not be used for any ulterior or collateral purpose.

The Fearys have an arbitration agreement with the Commissioner of Crown Lands, which the commissioner says includes an obligation to keep the arbitration process confidential. When Mr Feary sent copies of a valuation report obtained as part of the arbitration to various newspapers, Federated Farmers and others, Crown lawyer Hamish Hancock wrote to the Fearys’ lawyer emphasising confidentiality.

Mr Hancock said the commissioner, whom he represented in the Fearys’ dispute, did not want the parties’ energies directed to unproductive side issues. Mr Feary’s response was to release another document.

You may not copy, republish or distribute this page or the content from it without having obtained written permission from the copyright owner. To enquire about copyright clearances contact clearance@fairfaxnz.co.nz.

R Non Emuss | July 24th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
“expose the ugliness of what is going on”.

They wouldn’t dare try it on with someone like William Bell or Antony Dixon. The ‘brave’ bastards only go after law abiding people who they know won’t react in a personal manner.

Jack | July 24th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
too right Jack, prosecutions are undertaken where it’s expedient to do so, and in the interests of the prevailing hegemony.

Simian | July 25th, 2007 at 2:42 pm
Simian, your a cock!

donk | July 28th, 2007 at 5:39 pm
Glad to know we are getting to you donk..or shouldn’t that be dork!

Simian | July 28th, 2007 at 8:05 pm
Your not getting to me, your just a cock, in general. Even if you didn’t write a thing you would still be a criminal loving cock.

donk | August 1st, 2007 at 11:24 am
thought i’d get the ball rolling on some tips for dealing with the police in a street stop or ‘turnover.’

#1 whatever you do, don’t get drawn into a potential arrest for ‘contempt of cop’ i.e, be courteous, provide your details-name address, date of birth, occupation.

#2 your biggest risk of being assaulted by police is at the time of arrest-police can use reasonable force to overcome resistance in effecting the arrest and this ‘licence’ can be taken too its limits if you piss the arresting cop off.

#3 Witnesses are cop’s worst enemies, especially if they are in numbers. Police have their own witnesses in the form of their colleagues, therefore it often becomes a numbers game as to whose version of events prevails..

Well, I’ve set the ball rolling for others to contribute some of their ‘wisdom’ & add to this knowledge base

Mr Anon

MrAnon | August 4th, 2007 at 9:43 pm
#4 if you are being targeted by the police because you are on their ‘to get list’ be aware that the safest place is your castle-home. If they wish to get you on your own turf they are going to need a warrant or power to enter and search without warrant.

Be aware that everyone including the police have a common law right to knock on your door. If you dont want the police there, tell them to leave pursuant to the Trespass Act.

Again, a numbers game as to witnesses-theirs versus yours comes into play should their version of events be tested in court.

Any one add to this?

Anyone but me | August 5th, 2007 at 9:07 pm
Surveillance:

if you believe you are under surveillance by the police, carry a cam corder with you & film them. You can normally smell them a mile off & they arent particularly good at playing follow that guy. Upload it to this site & we can play name the cop!

Anonymous | August 5th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
‘My home is my castle’ is a fallacy. If mr plod wants to gain entry he’ll misuse the misuse of drugs act or get a tame court official to give him a warrant and there’s nothing you can do about it. Kick up a stink and you’re marked for life.

Jack | August 6th, 2007 at 5:59 am
too right about being marked for life.. these guys have long memories and way too much unbridled power.

Thankfully the atrocious behaviour of some of these people is getting a long overdue airing-ala the Nicholas & other cases.

Anon_2 | August 6th, 2007 at 3:09 pm
It is truly a sad day, when an police officer who has beaten his wife, broken into her home, sexually assaulted her and harassed her and their children for many years after divorce, can take her to court and extract $30,000 from her.

This Officer has been stood down, he has been charged with assault, he has been investigated, and yet the police force do nothing, but protect him, hide evidence, and stuff up the investigation. They cannot even collect relevant evidence. He and his colleagues are now under internal investigation by the PCA, a group of men and women who investigate their own. What a joke!!

The NZ Police are the biggest terrorist threat to this country, and they are the largest organised crime ring.

Jake | August 9th, 2007 at 9:47 am
#134 That’s a good one.

You can also take photos on your cellphone if it has an inbuilt camera.

A friend of mine was being followed by some very obvious PIs for days.
Eventually one day at the traffic lights he got out of his car, walked over the PIs car and took a photo of them and also one of their licence plate with his phone. He then went back to his car and drove off when the lights changed as calm as anything.

I would love to have seen their face when he did that!

George | August 10th, 2007 at 11:55 am
since when did the police go around blowing people up Jake. What an absolutely deranged comment.

shane | August 10th, 2007 at 6:47 pm
RE #139

Jake is obviously using the term terrorist to convey the fact that this egg has been terrorizing his ex wife.

As to sabotaging evidence we’ve all seen that one with the Nicholas case.

The P.C.A sucks, its investigators are cops & the complaint process is a farce, intended to delay.

Serge | August 10th, 2007 at 9:50 pm
Our dear old Scud is conspicuous by his absence..

Serge | August 10th, 2007 at 9:51 pm
I got sick and tired of ‘dear ole Jack’ deleting my posts

scud | August 10th, 2007 at 10:28 pm
Don’t lie scud. I see you’re pissed off Dewar was convicted on all charges. Funny how you can have a conviction overturned on appeal but not so an aquittal. Pity that, I’d love to appeal the gang rapist’s acquittals.

LINK

LINK

A conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by the Rickard defence?

Jack | August 11th, 2007 at 7:00 am
Why would I need to lie Jack? I get pissed off with all sorts of things, Dewar ain’t one of them. Calm down Jacky boy, you’ll give yaself a coronary!

scud | August 11th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
You’re right scud, there’s no need to lie but you do it anyway.

Jack | August 11th, 2007 at 7:40 pm
Whatever you say big man…

scud | August 12th, 2007 at 12:09 am
Here’s one for you scud, I know you’re guilty of that too.

LINK

Jack | August 12th, 2007 at 6:45 am
Jake you need to pull your head out of the sand.

Cass | August 13th, 2007 at 7:29 pm
Scud for the next Counties-Manukau Mayor??

Anonymous | August 16th, 2007 at 11:03 pm
“Scud for the next Counties-Manukau Mayor??”

What the fuck are ya?? You want a bent cop as Mayor of Counties-Manukau? ___________________________________________________________________________

Monday, 5 February 2007

Why an internal Complaints Authority will not work for CYFS.

The Police Complaints authority is a complete and utter waste of time. The vast majority of complaints made to it are referred back to the Police ‘professional conduct division’.

The police officers who fill this division will:

1. Try to convince you to agree that you complaint was groundless. the formal name for this is conciliation, and in the official report it gives the impression that some form of redress or apology or conciliation has been offered. This is far from the truth, what in fact happens is that police use sophisticated interrogation and manipulation techniques to destroy your confidence in your complaint and to get you to drop it.

2. If you refuse to be ‘conciliated’ you will be subjected to character assassination and ad hominem attack - your motives will be questioned - and the complaint will be denied. Any lie put forward by the offending officer will be accepted out of hand and your evidence counts for nothing.

3. You have the right to protest this Police investigation of themselves — and the PCA response will be to refer your response back to the police, and they will get to concoct another series of denials of it all.

4. This carries on until you get sick of it. 5. Even if the PCA does come down on your side the Police can give it 2 fingers as it has no authority over them at all.

These are the stats for complaints from last year taken from the PCA yearly report:

A. Total complaints - 2829

B. Accepted for jurisdiction - 2481

C. Not pursued - 164

D. Sustained or partially sustained - 96

E. Conciliated or not sustained - 563.

The balance are still ongoing.

So in a year, Police accept they were out of line in a whopping 3.8% of cases.

There sure are a heck of a lot of people out there making false complaints aren’t there?

How lucky we are to have a police force that can be trusted to investigate themselves eh?

Now, apply the same process to CYFS complaints………………..

Jack | August 22nd, 2007 at 6:23 am
I agree 100% on your sentiments Jack, the P.C.A and any CYF equivalent will be as effective as a limp penis in an orgy!

i cannot understand why these farces continue to prevail when day after day the corrupt nature of these organizations is exposed.

As for the PCA looking into police pursuit policy, that will be an even lamer exercise…the best we can do is take positive steps to wrangle in their unbridled power via covert filming, recording & documenting on the internet,in an attempt to expose their coverups.

Serge | August 22nd, 2007 at 5:05 pm
ok jack. out of the 2829 complaints, how many complainants were there. if I have confused your little brain, what i mean is how many dickheads have complained more than once.

I can tell you, alot of people just complain for the sake of complaining.

shane | August 23rd, 2007 at 9:21 pm
“I can tell you, alot of people just complain for the sake of complaining.”

Got any evidence of that shane?

Jack | August 24th, 2007 at 8:11 am
Shane is right Jack, here’s some evidence…go to: www.bentcops.org plenty of evidence there mate

scud | August 24th, 2007 at 4:01 pm
I’ve had a good look through that site scud but I couldn’t find a single example of the author complaining for the sake of complaining.

Jack | August 24th, 2007 at 4:18 pm
lol good one Jack!

scud | August 24th, 2007 at 5:49 pm
In the words of my good friend Mark Brandon ‘Chopper’ Reid “Whinge whinge, fucken whinge”.

scud | August 24th, 2007 at 5:53 pm
Did you see that scud?

2. If you refuse to be ‘conciliated’ you will be subjected to character assassination and ad hominem attack - your motives will be questioned - and the complaint will be denied. Any lie put forward by the offending officer will be accepted out of hand and your evidence counts for nothing.

You don’t have to complain to the PCA for the cops to resort to those tactics.

Jack | August 24th, 2007 at 7:02 pm
I call it a sense of humour Jack, you might like to get one, it may help somewhat. sheesh.

scud | August 25th, 2007 at 12:20 am
Oh! it was a joke scud, hehehe, I get jokes.

Jack | August 25th, 2007 at 6:12 am
Jack, your a cock!!

shane | August 29th, 2007 at 8:54 pm
“I can tell you, alot of people just complain for the sake of complaining.”

Got any evidence for that yet shane?

Jack | August 30th, 2007 at 6:11 am
Nothing on hand Jackass. Much like the entire contents of this web site. No evidence to back it up.

shane | August 31st, 2007 at 10:42 am
Hey scud, hows your mate Tana going?

shane | August 31st, 2007 at 10:43 am
Did you read this shane?

…woah.

Some people on here need to give it a rest.
Take some time out.
Some here are purposefully making this an annoying, immature (on their part, they know who they are with out me having to identify them) debate to be involved in by making abusive remarks and attempting to wind people up.
Pretty predictable diversionary tactics that have similarly been employed by all the great liars and cowards throughout history.
To simplify the issues of this topic and this site in general and to get back to what I perceive this site to be about one must admit that bent cops/Jack’s sole purpose isn’t just to try and bag all police employees the country over for in reality not all are baggable.
You donk, scud and co. know this so if your purpose is preserving the immaculate prestige ideology of law and order then please go and start your own site because that’s not what this one is about.
This site is about CORRUPT POLICE AND EXPOSING THEM if you didn’t notice.
You and your juvenile crew have a hard time it would seem admitting that police of this sort exist in the first place.
Police and the law and order society set themselves these lofty ideals or as individuals involve themselves out of a desire to promote them yet a lot routinely fail/ purposely fail to live up to them so they must be had up by someone because as Jack has illustrated the PCA is about as good as pissing into a Norwester on the plains of Canterbury in the height of summer.
There, thankfully, are police out there who take the role of a policeman seriously and fulfil their responsibilities to the best of their abilities and beyond.
Society is much indebted to these people as the things they have to face are more often than not negative and things the greater society would like controlled and dealt with by people other than themselves.
But from what I gather from this site generally is there is a lot of small minded pettiness and ignorance on the part of both obviously bored and incompetent human beings (Black, Cullum and possibly scud and donk but they seem slightly more capable of independent thought……slightly) and police alike.
When you have tuggers like Black and Cullum who are obviously such dishevelled serial whingers running to and fro to the cops and the local gossip mill it doesn’t take long to get a mountain from a mole hill as Jack has so eloquently detailed.
Meanwhile while the police are attending to Cullum and Black’s inane paranoid ramblings and petty oneupmanshit who knows what the police may be better spent concentrating on?
People such as Black and Cullum should be ashamed.
I think this site has a genuine purpose and seems to be monitored by a humorous (in spite of the experiences he’s had to endure), careful (in so far as collecting evidence to present a truthful account) and remarkably emotionally/mentally resourceful man (again in light of what he has had to endure - a lot of people would lose the plot but Jack has put a good deal of his no doubt frustrated energy into attempting to restore some sort of logic to the chaos of the events instead of resorting to ignorant violence).
The wider issue is the double standards that the police and the legal system as a whole regularly traipse out when they realise they have encountered someone who won’t back down to the bull shit notion that the law is god or at least some close affiliate of hers.
What about the thousands of people routinely had by the police and legal system day to day just because they lack the courage or articulate abilities of Jack?
This site is just a drop in the bucket of how corrupt and self-serving so many democracies are through their police and smaller societal governing bodies the world over.
We should be thankful we can have websites like this freely available in this country and behave like Jack and use the legal system to strive for justice.
Or would it just be easier if our police and government could kidnap, torture till guilty or kill if not guilty like China, South Africa and South America?

Whom? | August 4th, 2006 at 8:35 pm

Its quite clear that even if Jack has embellished to fill in gaps, he’s been a consistent voice of dissent to the point of annoying or all the other weak (in the face of what has been meted out to him by inbreds and police alike) points of detraction the voices of opposition here continue to attempt to introduce as counter arguments you cannot deny that people like Britton are a m m mm mmm mental menace and that the police have repeatedly failed to assist Jack after different individual police made the issue personal and closed ranks like a scared bunch of red neck dimwits.
Britton has no point in life other than to involve other people in his misery and destruction so as to create something to temporarily detract from the fact that his life is actually only self created and perpetuated misery and destruction.
Pretty typical antisocial, loser, sociopathic bull shit which in true antisocial, loser, sociopath tradition make it someone else’s problem as well.
The cops are just jocks who have become obsessed with coming out with their egos intact (a common problem with ‘I am the law’ ‘law enforcers’) which thus negates ever being able to go back on decisions and reinstate justice.
BUT DO YOU KNOW WHO ARE BELOW EVEN THESE WEAK; SUB HUMANS WHO REFUSE TO USE THEIR MIND AND MORALS?
All the pro corruption supporters who profess some objective stance/intent i.e. zebuqueen, scud, donk etc… and then the rest of the former/current cop/I’m married to a/distantly related to someone who knows someone who knows a cop, knee jerk, tosser, dyslexia suffering, addle brained, half wits ie zebuqueen,scud,donk who come here and go - ‘Hey, someone’s hassling the cops - oh look he’s Dutch oh those liberal bastards fuck he must be a pinko commy queer non DB drinking wannabe intellectual fucking probably doesn’t even play rugby fuckin’ fucker’ no brainer winners who are all denying the basic fact that there is a continual evasion of duty here on the part of the cops.
The fact that none of these pro corruption supporters for a second can even share any empathy with Jack and restrain themselves to admit that perhaps just possibly maybe there’s been a slight miscarriage of justice here on more than one time and level is absolutely disgusting.
Most of the attackers of Jack here and their behaviour is shameful and hateful and telling of the fact that these people have acute issues of their own that need addressing.
It is this kind of weak mindedness in making human rights decisions that make people like Jacks attackers perfect candidates for turncoats, informers and general brown nosers to the occupying force should a Nazi like occupation situation ever arise here.
This kind of mentality of not pursuing what’s clearly right due to having to go back on ones word appears to be extremely common in the practice of the NZ government, police and other petty beauracracies such as CYPS, WINZ and Study Link - the last three all absolutely pathetically mismanaged organizations.
And don’t get me started on other ‘democracies’ around the world.
TO HIDE BEHIND loop holes, technicalities, formalities, red tape, legislation, correct procedure, PETTY BEAURACRACY etc..IN FEAR OF WHAT WAS A CLEAR CUT ISSUE EVERY TIME that could have been resolved from the get go by following through with objective, duty bound decisive action instead of letting the issues to become personal, ego oriented, ignorance beset and bent to work place peer pressure and thus becoming completely blown out of proportion and ballsed up IS ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLY INCOMPETANT.
ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE LIKE JACK WHO TAKE IT TO THE SYSTEM AND UTILIZE ALL FORMAL CHANNELS CORRECTLY SHOW THE SYSTEM UP FOR WHAT IT IS - A COMPLETE DOG EAT DOG CIRCUS OF MACHO ONE UP MAN SHIP & EGO MASTURBATION.
Whom? | August 6th, 2006 at 9:05 pm

———————————————————————————————————————–

“even if Jack has embellished to fill in gaps”

Absolutely no embellishment on my part Whom?, in fact, for brevities sake, I left a heap of stuff out.

When scud and co read Whom’s? first post I’ll bet they blurted out , ‘Who the fuck are these Cullum and Black jokers he’s going on about?’

“you cannot deny that people like Britton are a m m mm mmm mental menace and that the police have repeatedly failed to assist Jack after different individual police made the issue personal and closed ranks like a scared bunch of red neck dimwits.”

That’s the crux of the matter right there, exactly right except that the cops also used said mongrels to further inflame already dangerous situations. An example being Senior Sergeant Neville Haggarts acting as Agent Provocateur to “test my reaction”.

Jack | August 7th, 2006

———————————————————————————————————————–

Yeah I was more using the embellishing thing to point out one of the various weak, un true things your detractors on here have tried unsuccessfully to use against you.

I don’t think you embellished anywhere any time.

Haggart acting in an absolutely un professional & provoking manner - exactly I didn’t even really get into specifics about the sordid relationship that the local swine had with the local psych case thug.

I mean this whole thing - issue after issue, where do you start?

I tried to be admittedly general in attacking the original problem and then the un empathetic attitudes of your detractors on here which I feel are just as shameful as the original problems with the police/local red necks as they indirectly condone it by not acknowledging there’s a gross miscarriage of justice.

You just come away with the impression that they all (cops, Britton etc…) sit around at Britton’s at night sharing a crate and a cone trying to utilise their depleted grey matter to come up with some scenario in which you will crack.

Its sick, its childish, its rural policing for you.

Knowing someone through the final bastions of ‘good bloke’ territory i.e. the pub or rugby team or stock sales yards and supporting them on those grounds is more important than aiding someone who comes to you with irrefutable evidence that so called ‘good bloke’ is in fact a degenerate potential psychopath seems to be the case here.

Pretty typical good ole boys club thing going on here.

Someone should round them all up and assimilate them into the staff of some American deep south local ’sheerifs’ where they really could live out all their sick, violent and depraved fantasies without restraint.

Whom? | August 7th, 2006

Jack | August 31st, 2007 at 12:25 pm
Tana Banana Wee Wooley Winky is doing fine thanks, Shane…

scud | September 3rd, 2007 at 6:33 pm
Hey scud, you seen “niko above the law”? Good movie.

shane | September 5th, 2007 at 7:18 am
Are you a cop too shane?

BentCops

37 FEEDBACK bruiser you liar

303 Responses to “37 FEEDBACK bruiser you liar”