BCL

19 Falsified Document

Perverting the course of justice. 8

1
bent cops

After I saw the cop car go past our place on its way up the valley towards where the reckless shooters had gone I turned on my trusty cop surveillance radio and this is what I recorded.

Male voice…10.3…(cop speak for free for another job)..Ahh…We’ll give you the result when we get a bit closer to town.

Female voice…Roger.

A little later…Female voice…Go ahead…(For some reason I didn’t hear the call in.)

Male voice…Ahh…K3…(Code for no offence disclosed.) No harm…Ahhmm…One of them’s the farm manager like you said (O’Keefe) and the other ones a doctor at the hospital. (House surgeon Rob Shaw.) Forward the 101 (above) to me, I’ll fill it out and complete it. (By that he meant, leave the falsifying to me.)

Female voice…Roger.

You will notice on the above document (the 101) the words “ULTIMATE RESULT” and below them the words “No persons located”.
2
bent cops

This is what Guido Croes, my neighbour who rang the police prior to me that night, said to me next morning. (Note top of Record of Telephone Call - the 101.)

“Yea I was pissed off with that ****, (he was referring to the gunman O’Keefe) He never shoots the road, and why shoot under my ****en house.” Guido went on, “I said, you ****en ignorant ****.” (Guido had gone to his road gateway and bailed up O’Keefe when he returned up the valley still banging away.) “You don’t need to shoot under someone’s house.” Then to me, “I rang the cops and said, are you allowed to do it?” (fire a gun from a vehicle on a public road at night onto and across farmland towards people’s houses) and they said, “No”. Guido went on, “If you shoot the willows here, my paddocks here are above the willow trees, and if one of my weaners gets plugged I’m down four or five hundred dollars.” “Mikes a real ignorant ****, and he’s supposed to be a Rural Neighbourhood Watch Warden as well.”

That so aptly called “ignorant ****”, a person who together with Speed and the James Gang allowed Britton free access to the farmland around our boundaries, even when they were asked not to by Sandra. They willingly aided and abetted Britton in his criminal campaign against us and they are the sort of people the police support and lie for.

I rang the police that evening because O’Keefe had fired shots into a large pine tree about 50 meters from our house and well within our boundary fence.

On the bottom of the 101 is written. “As discussed could you have O’Keefe seen at 470 Makirikiri road and warned.” That was written by Senior Sergeant Bob Burns. I went to see him the day after O’Keefe did his thing and I asked Burns what he was going to do about it. He made a phone call and afterward he said the police could do nothing because the police that attended the scene of the incident failed to locate anyone. The words below ‘No persons located’ were added to that document (1) after I had spoken Burns. Did Burns know that he was repeating the lie?

Constable John Grace was sent to “warn” O’Keefe. Not long after I saw Grace coming out of Speed’s (O’Keefe’s boss) gully with a deer on his back. It must have been a stern warning all right. O’Keefe commits several firearm’s offences and all that happens is that Grace gets a new hunting possie. This matter proves that police documents cannot be trusted to be accurate, ever.

And the corruption goes all the way to the chiefs. That’s why the indians are so blatant in their lies.
3
bent cops

Mears reckons that falsifying a Police document to defeat the course of justice is a “minor” matter.

One (Friday) afternoon cops Garry Smith, Lyndsay Edwards, Kennedy (pictured) and some other cop came to our home to look for guns. They found a legal slug gun but while there I asked Kennedy if he had spoken to O’Keefe on the night of the aforementioned shooting spree and he confirmed that he had. He’d forgotten he wasn’t to confirm that. A liar with a bad memory. Just to the left of Kennedy’s head is the pine tree from where Britton fired at least 4 of his shots in the direction of our house. (7 Shots Fired)

6 Responses to “19 Falsified Document”

  1. THIS IS HOW IT STARTS.

    19 December 2005
    By LANE NICHOLS

    Police have waived a Waikanae man’s $150 fine after he claimed a police officer altered an infringement notice with correction fluid after a roadside botch-up.

    They say it was a simple error by a junior constable.

    Roger Greenfield said he was driving to work at Wellington Hospital on October 19 when he was pulled over on Cable St for driving through an orange light. The officer took his details and an infringement notice arrived in the mail a few days later.

    Mr Greenfield was surprised to read the incident had taken place on Wakefield St – a one-way road in the opposite direction. He wrote to the Police Infringement Bureau asking for the ticket to be cancelled because it was “not factual”.

    But police said his recollection of the incident differed from the officer’s evidence and the ticket would stand.

    When he again protested – this time under oath before a justice of the peace – they sent him the officer’s duplicate ticket. It had been corrected and now said the offence happened on Cable St, Mr Greenfield said.

    The police then requested a copy of his original ticket so they could investigate. They informed him last week it had been waived because of an error.

    “I wasn’t in Wakefield St, so you can’t give someone a ticket for being somewhere they weren’t. He doesn’t know what he’s doing. He deserves to lose his job.”

    Mr Greenfield said the incident had made him question the credibility of the ticketing system.

    Sergeant Simon Paterson, of the road policing group, said a young constable unfortunately put the wrong street name on the ticket. He amended a duplicate copy when he realised his mistake, but failed to follow procedure by notifying Mr Greenfield of the change.

    Tickets were not legal documents and were sometimes amended by officers, but police had decided to waive the fine because of the procedural error.

    “The officer’s got confused. He’s realised he’s got the street wrong so he’s changed the location on the duplicate copy.

    “Mr Greenfield probably thinks there’s been some big cover-up, but that’s simply not the case. We see it as a training issue.”


  2. I don’t have a ‘learned opinion’ Jack, but really I think all this is a shit storm in a tea cup…these forms are hardly statutory declarations are they? There is hardly a huge cover-up.


  3. By itself it doesn’t seem much scud but if its ok to prosecute Kellick (below) why not O’Keefe and his Doctor mate. What they did was way worse than Kellick’s trifling EMPTY shell “crime”.

    KELLICK

    They may not be sworn documents but they are used as evidence in Court when required. If they are not a true accounts of incidents and they are proffered as aditional “proof ” then it would amount to perverting the course of justice. Kennedy and or Sloss perverted/defeated the cource of justice by signing that false report.

    Refer 1 @ http://www.bentcops.org/nzpolice/payouts/


  4. Hi is this person you mention Glen Okeefe


  5. Hi Shaun, his name is Mike O’Keefe.


  6. Spotlighters’ shot narrowly misses woman
    29 January 2008

    A Christchurch woman camping on the Borland Saddle, Southland, this month says she froze with fear after a bullet fired in the dead of the night narrowly missed her.

    Yesterday Jane Severn recounted the fear she felt as a bullet from a group spotlighting for deer “whirred” past her, almost hitting her.

    Severn and her partner had climbed Mount Burns on January 4 and parked their van in an off-road area sheltered by plantings to sleep for the night.

    During the night she got up to go to the toilet, saw the lights of a vehicle approaching, and realised its occupants were spotlighting for deer, she said.

    As the car passed by she heard a shot. “It felt very close to me. It was scary … it was real scary. I was just thinking `Don’t shoot again’.”

    The car drove off slowly, but fear rooted Severn to the spot. “I just shivered and shook.”

    The car’s occupants did not appear to see her at any point, Severn said. She did not see the car’s make or occupants clearly, but hoped her story would help prevent similar incidents.

    Department of Conservation (DOC) acting Murihiku area manager Sarah Dowie said there were bylaws against spotlighting in a national park.

    “It’s purely because of the safety issue, because it’s so hard to identify a target or what’s behind it.”

    Invercargill police arms officer Tony Botting said shooting from public roads was banned.

    Spotlighting had to be done in a controlled environment as a shooters’ field of vision was usually narrow, he said.


Comment on this Article