48 STEPHEN POYNTER COOKS HIS GOOSE.

,“Freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having.” Judge McGuire

Form Of Attestation As A Member Of The Police Of New Zealand (Section 37 of the Police Act 1958) Oath,
I Sergeant Andrew MacDonald do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady the Queen in the Police, without favour or affection, malic or ill-will until I am legally discharged: that I will see and cause, Her Majesty’s peace to be kept and preserved: that I will prevent to the best of my power all offences against the peace; and that while I will continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knobawledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law. So help me God.

On.13 March 2006, and without consulting me, STEPHEN POYNTER a part owner of the Lady Joy Rest Home began to exterminate the wild goats that lived on and about our neighbouring farmlets using a high powered 243 rifle. He did however approach another neighbour, Kevin Carr, and he gave Poynter permission to shoot goats ( “don’t shoot any deer “) on land that my wife and I legally occupy. The CARR/Van Der Lubbe boundary fence is in the wrong place due to the topography of the land. I pointed that fact out to the cops but they preferred to ignore it.

X marks the spot from where Poynter shot at least 5 goats and the arrow points to my residence at the time.

Note the built up area in the background.

I let Poynter know at the time, and in no uncertain terms, that I was not at all pleased with his behaviour, the incredibly loud gunshots and the screaming of the shot goats. Poynter’s reply was, “Get used to it.”

Had he said, sorry, my bad, instead of “Get used to it,” I would not have reported the matter to the Police but as he was unrepentant and returned for another bomb-up the next evening I contacted the cops. A Constable J Geurtjens spoke to Poynter and warned him not to fire his weapon in a built up area again.
Incidentally, Poynter didn’t check if the goats he’d shot were actually dead nor did he dispose of the carcases, he simply left them to die and rot where they fell.
______________________________

Then on 2 Feb 2007 Poynter fired his “cannon” again. Just one shot this time (a deliberate provocation?) and I bailed him up about 5 minutes later as he was exiting the area. This is how the conversation went.

Hey! Are you some sort of bloody moron or what? Aye? The cops have warned you about not firing that in a built up area. Why do you persist in doing it?

Poynter….Have you got a problem Jack?

J…………Yeah I have, with people firing ****** cannons in a built up area, that’s what I’ve got.

P…………You know as well as I do that I’m well within my law.

J………….No you’re not, you’re disturbing me, it’s against the law. I’m gonna see to it that you lose your gun licence this time. You’ve been warned already, twice, by the police and you’re still doing it. You just don’t give a **** do ya, about other people?.

P…………You want a lot of trouble for yourself don’t ya?

J………….What, you’re gonna cause me trouble are ya?

P………….Why do you persist?

J…………..Because I don’t want you firing that f**ken cannon here. I had trouble with that **** up there, (Kevin Carr) and now you come here and 5 minutes after you arrive you’re doing it. I don’t want you doing it.

P…………..Well I don’t want you building that house there.

J…………..Well that’s just bloody tough.

P…………..Exactly.

J……………That’s not against the law.

P……………Firing this is not against the law.

J…………….It is against the law, you wanna check your arms code.

P…………….I’ve spoken to the police.

J…………….Yeah, and they warned you.

P……………I’m well within the law.

J……………And they warned you not to do it.

P……………Rubbish.

J…………….I’ll private prosecute you if I have to, that you will not do it.

P……………You are unbelievable Jack.

J…………….Why don’t you use a .22? I wouldn’t have any problem with a .22. No you’ve got to use that ****** big thing.

P…………….So you want me to maim animals do you?

J…………….No I don’t, you don’t have to maim animals.

P…………….Hurt and maim animals.

J…………….You’re doing a red herring there.

P…………….I purchased a weapon to do a specific job.

J……………..Look, just look up your arms code and it says there that you don’t disturb other people, you look it up.

P…………….Was I firing it at 5.30 in the morning?

J…………….You’ve disturbed me again, look, I’m f**ken angry.

P……………Yeah, I know you are. (I was just as angry the fist time he did it and he knew that when he did it twice more.)

J……………..I’m disturbed. Don’t do it, this is your last warning. I don’t give a **** about the cops, I’m giving you your last warning, do not do it again. Simple as that.

P…………….Are you threatening me Jack?

J……………..Yeah, I’m gonna take you to court.

P…………….Are you threatening me?

J……………..I’m taking you to court.

P…………….If you’re f**ken threatening me go on then. I will, I will retaliate to you. Don’t ever f**k about with me.

J…………….I’m threatening to take you to court.

P……………You don’t know who you’re toying with.

J……………..I do, I know exactly what you are.

P…………….You have no f**ken idea who you’re dealing with boy.

J……………..Yes I do.

P……………..I’ve tried really hard to be a nice neighbour to you.

J………………No you haven’t, you fired that cannon.

P……………..You’ve got no f**ken idea, you wait. You wait, you c**t. I’ll f**ken get ya, you f**ken wait.

J……………..How are you gonna get me?

P…………….You say anything about me firing a weapon on my land, in rural land, well within my law and boundary. If you say anything or do anything against me, I will do things against you.

J……………..Like what?

P…………….You’ve been told. You’ve got no f**ken idea.

J……………..I know all about you Mr ………..?

P ……………You’ve got no f**ken idea.

J……………..Will you get your ……………………….out again, will ya?

Naturally I reported this latest and way more sinister offending by Poynter to the Police and then the circus began.

A Sergeant Kevin Smith contacted Poynter and asked him to come into the local nick for a chat. Poynter did so and was again told of his responsibilities in relation to the Arms Act. At that time or shortly thereafter Poynter was told, by Police, that I don’t have a firearms licence and that little “gem” of information set Poynter’s criminal mastermind intellect into hatching a cunning plan to ‘f**ken get’ me into deep trouble with the law. (Smith later refused to confirm or deny if it was him that had told Poynter that I didn’t have a gun licence.)

Poynter then went home and cooked up a letter to deflect Police attention from himself by falsely denouncing me. The letter, addressed to Sergeant Smith, was so full of provable lies, one of them being that he did not threaten me in any way on the morning of 2/2/07, that only a “slimey” (Smith’s description of Poynter) liar, used to getting his own way, would expect anyone to believe it.

Well you guessed it; Mr Plod took Poynter’s litany of lies as gospel and acted accordingly.

The second to last paragraph of Poynter’s letter to Sergeant Smith went like this, ‘I have observed Mr Van Der Lubbe walking his property with a rifle over his shoulder and so has Tristam (Jodie) Robertson, of 41 Paterson Street Wanganui on separate occasions. If Mr Van Der Lubbe does not have a Firearms Licence this gives my family and I great concern.’

You know, if Poynter had any brains at all, he would have planted a rifle somewhere round my home and then made his false accusation that he had seen me taking a rifle for a walk, that way Mr Plod would have had something to find when he carried out his search.

Form Of Attestation As A Member Of The Police Of New Zealand (Section 37 of the Police Act 1958) Oath

I Inspector Duncan MacLeod do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady the Queen in the Police, without favour or affection, malic or ill-will until I am legally discharged: that I will see and cause, Her Majesty’s peace to be kept and preserved: that I will prevent to the best of my power all offences against the peace; and that while I will continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law. So help me God.

As time passed it became glaringly obvious to me that Mr Plod wasn’t going to do anything about my intimidation/unlawful discharge complaint so I gave the cop who had been delegated the job of giving me the usual run around a copy of the latter portion of the above tape transcript. I thought that ought to do the trick but still nothing happened so I went to see Chester Borrows, National MP for Wanganui. He wasn’t there so I told his secretary all about how the cops were behaving and she said Chester would look into it. Well as it turned out asking Chester for help was a waste of time except for the fact that I did find out from his secretary that Wanganui’s top cop Inspector Duncan MacLeod had no intention of doing his duty in this matter. Luckily I also went and spoke to Jill Pettis Labour list MP for Wanganui who wrote to Duncan MacLeod and asked him how the investigation into my complaint was coming along.
She also asked, ‘3. Is Mr Poynter in breach of the firearms code by discharging a high calibre firearm in close proximity to a residential area?’
MacLeod’s reply was, ‘Yes. This matter has been clarified by a legal opinion.’
Mrs Pettis also asked, ‘4. Has Mr Poynter been advised by Police, on any occasion, not to discharge a firearm? In particular, has he been warned about not discharging a firearm in or around the land at the bottom of Roberts Avenue hill/Paterson Street?’ MacLeod replied, ‘Yes. Mr Poynter has received a previous Police warning concerning this matter on 14 July 2006.’

Jill Pettis’s letter to MacLeod certainly did the trick, before you could say bent cops Poynter was charged with intimidation and unlawful discharge of a firearm. One of his bail conditions was that he was not to discharge a firearm within 300 meters of my home.

Using the Official Information Act I obtained copies of Poynter’s letter to Sergeant Smith and also a copy a statement made to Sergeant Andrew McDonald by Poynter’s one time flunky Tristan Robertson. Robertson said in his statement that he had overheard the 2/2/07 altercation between Poynter and myself and that he ‘didn’t hear’ Poynter threaten me in any way. He also corroborated Poynter’s earlier false accusation that he had seen me ‘walking a rifle’. This is what he said,

‘I remember a month or two before this incident seeing Jack carrying a firearm. It looked like a .22 calibre rifle.

It was about 3 feet in length. It had a brown wooden stock + a shoulder strap. It was open sighted + did not have a scope.

When I saw Jack I saw him crossing his paddock heading towards the bush on the back of his property. I assumed that he was heading off to shoot some goats as well.

There was no one else with him.

I could see Jack quite clearly, it was a fine day + I could see the gun clearly. He was carrying it on the diagonal on his back.

I saw Jack with a gun probably a few months before that as well. I didn’t pay too much attention to it because it is not unusual for the land owners to shoot the pigs (crossed out) goats on their land.

And three paragraphs further on he said this, ‘The two times I have seen Jack with a gun occurred within the last 12 months.’

At the bottom of his statement he wrote in his own hand, ‘I have read this statement and it is true and correct.’

Well the fact of the matter is Robertson, with the help of the ‘criminal mastermind’ Poynter, made the whole rifle story up to get the heat off Poynter and onto me and they thereby committed an offence against Section 115 (b) of the Crimes Act 1961, ‘Conspiring to bring a false accusation.’ (Seven years max)

A few months into the time it took for the unlawful discharge/intimidation charges to be heard the Police Prosecutor Sergeant David Grey (unfortunate name for a cop) decided that he would ‘resolve’ the matter out of Court by getting the parties to sign a good behaviour bond. The charges would be too hard to prove he reckoned. I asked him if this good behaviour bond would include a clause preventing Poynter firing off his ‘cannon’ near my home. His reply was no. I wasn’t having a bar of that so I made an appointment to see Grey at the cop shop and arrived at the appointed time armed with a list of questions. As soon as he saw my list and that I meant business he called in another cop as a witness and asked if I was recording the meeting. I told him I was. Anyway after listening to Grey drone on about how large Poynter’s block of land was and how loud I sounded on the altercation tape I came to the conclusion that his reasons for dropping the charges were crap. I then wrote a letter to his boss Duncan MacLeod pointing out a few things such as his own words in his answers to questions 3 and 4 in his letter to Jill Pettis. See below. A few days later I learned that Sergeant Grey had been taken off the case and that the prosecution would continue.

In the mean time (19 Oct 2007) I made a written complaint to Inspector MacLeod that Poynter and Robertson had conspired together to pervert/defeat/obstruct the course by making false statements to Police about the 2/2/07 altercation and that they had seen me with an illegal firearm. I told MacLeod that I wanted them prosecuted for it. To date nothing has been done about my complaint even though I have supplied the Police with more than enough evidence to bring a prosecution.
Sergeant Andrew McDonald tried to pooh pooh the matter of Robertson’s false accusations by telling me that he might have been mistaken about seeing me with a rifle but the way Robertson describes the sighting in his statement leaves no doubt that he wanted the Police to believe him when he said that he had seen me with a rifle. He went into some detail about the rifle and also said ‘I could see Jack quite clearly, it was a fine day + I could see the gun clearly.’ No ambiguity or wriggle room there. And Poynter even supplied a motive for making his false illegal rifle accusation when he stated, ‘You’ve got no f**ken idea, you wait. You wait, you c**t. I’ll f**ken get ya, you f**ken wait.’
MacLeod’s reason for doing nothing about the serious Crimes Act offences was a vague, lets see what happens when the outstanding charges are heard.

A BIT OF MUCKRAKING GOES A LONG WAY.

After a period of about 16 months the intimidation/firearm matters finally made it to Court. I was called to give evidence and according to the officer in charge of the case I did it well. Then Poynter’s lawyer Peter Brosnahan cross-examined me. He began his muckraking line of questions by asking me if I was a volatile person. If you have read Depositions, The Trial and Private Prosecution you will have noticed that Peter Brosnahan was my lawyer back in 1992 so he knew me well and he knew that I am not in the least volatile, not unless someone threatens me or fires a big gun in my vicinity that is. He then proceeded to bring up irrelevant matters that happened AFTER 2/2/07 in an attempt to sully my character, such as, Did you make complaints to the Council that Poynter was abusing his animals and wasting water? His last question was the clincher that proved to me that he was deliberately trying to mislead the Court. He asked, ‘Have you had your firearms licence revoked?’ As I said Brosnahan was my lawyer in 1992 and he was present when Constable Lance Walker handed me the letter revoking my firearms licence and he asked me then if I wanted him to contest the revocation. I told him not to bother. That totally irrelevant ‘Have you had your firearms licence revoked?’ question was asked solely to smear me and make Judge Davidson think I’m a ratbag. IE mislead the Court.
Also back in 1992 I told Brosnahan how Britton was terrorising my family while I was on bail awaiting my own day in Court and he told me that we couldn’t bring that stuff up in Court because it happened AFTER I had shot up Britton’s ute. How things have changed. It would appear that pisshead pete lost the last of his scruples when he was done for drunk driving.

The Police Prosecutor helped Brosnahan in his smear campaign when he said to Judge Davidson that he objected to one of Brosnahan’s questions because I might incriminate myself if I answered it. Incriminate myself! The Prosecutor knew very well that the cops weren’t going to pursue me over the allegedly threatening letters I had already admitted (Sergeant McDonald) to writing to Poynter and Robertson demanding that they recant their false statements that they had seen me with a rifle. The Prosecutor should have said, ‘I object to the question on the grounds that it is designed solely to mislead the Court.’ And to make matters worse the Prosecutor added that that matter was still under Police investigation when he knew very well that it wasn’t. He didn’t object to the rest of Brosnahan’s Court misleading line of questions so he probably objected to that one alone because he wanted to take the opportunity to throw a bit of muck at me himself. There is no question that the cops weren’t at all keen on getting Poynter convicted of a crime against me and their extreme reluctance to lay charges or even make a proper and timely investigation of my complaint proves that. Then there was Sergeant Grey’s attempt at ‘resolving’ the matter out of Court plus the Prosecutors own case wreaking ‘He might incriminate himself’ words. All that together leaves a very bad smell hanging over the whole business. Brosnahan’s and the Prosecutor’s behaviour concerned me so much that I told the Judge that if I didn’t explain matters further he ‘might get the wrong end of the stick.’ I was however dismissed from the witness box without being allowed the opportunity to set the record straight.

After a short break the Judge came back and said that even though a prima facie case of intimidation had been established against Poynter he was going to dismiss the charge because I gave as good as I got during the altercation. Gave as good as I got my arse! I don’t recall making any unlawful threats or saying anything like, ‘You’ve got no f**ken idea, you wait. You wait, you c**t. I’ll f**ken get ya, you f**ken wait’ to Poynter.
The Judge dismissed the firearms charge as well because apparently Poynter wasn’t close enough to my home when he fired his gun. So much for MacLeod’s flash Wellington ‘legal opinion’ which stated that Poynter had indeed been in breach of the Arms Code by discharging a high calibre firearm in close proximity to a residential area.
And no, the “legal opinion” wasn’t produced in Court but Poynter’s litany of lies letter/”statement” to Sergeant Kevin Smith was.

At about 7am last Sunday the 18th May Poynter fired off 5 more shots within about 150 meters of the house I’ve just about finished building. I phoned Mr Plod and reported the matter and was later told by Sergeant Kevin Smith that Poynter was ‘rubbing salt into the wound.’ He said that he had spoken to Poynter and that he had claimed that he was shooting at 5 goats that morning. I told the Sergeant that Poynter was lying again as there hadn’t been any goats around here for at least a month. I later rang my other neighbour, cow cocky Bruce Bristol, and asked him where all the goats had disappeared to and he said, ‘They were eating all my grass so I rounded them up and sent them off to the works a few weeks ago.’

On the evening of 20/6/08 I spotted Poynter sneaking up the gully that seperates our farmlets, he was carrying his rifle now fitted with a silencer, turns out he wanted me to see him.

Prior to Poynter uttering ‘You’ve got no f**ken idea, you wait. You wait, you c**t. I’ll f**ken get ya, you f**ken wait’ to me there were about 15 Fallow deer living at the back of our adjoining farmlets. They spent most of their time on 22a but occasionally they strayed onto Poynter’s back paddock.
Not so now, I rarely see a deer during daylight hours and those that are left, possibly 3, are very spotlight shy. I suspected from the outset that someone was killing them off.
Yesterday, 24/6/08, I went up the back in search of some missing cattle and as I walked along the Poynter boundary fence I spotted a dead female deer lying on Poynter’s place. I went over to investigate and found that it had been shot through the heart.
It was not in the least hidden from view so the killer deliberately left it to rot where it fell.
This photo was taken from my side of the boundary fence.

I then swivelled around in that position and took this photo of my home.
It wasn’t enough that he killed off the deer, he had to let me know it was him that did it. What sort of deluded ego maniac (’You have no f**ken idea who you’re dealing with boy’) would kill off wildlife to spite and or provoke me? The same sort of lowlife who would make false allegations to the cops and manufacture illegal drugs that’s who.

Shortly after I noticed that the deer were disappearing I paid a visit to the local home kill guy in the Aramoho shopping centre. I asked him if anyone was bringing in Fallow deer for processing. He told me that he gets them in quite regularly. I told him what was happening with the deer at my place and he said he’d keep his eyes and ears open. He then asked me where I lived and when I told him his body language change and I immediately suspected that he knew more than he was letting on. I already knew that it was his outfit that home killed Stephen Poynter’s pigs and that was the reason I went there before I went to any of the other meat processors in Wanganui. Well it would appear that Mr Home Kill reported our conversation back to Stephen Poynter because when I went back to his premises yesterday (25/7) he was decidedly hostile from the get go. I asked him if he remembered who I was and had Stephen Poynter brought in any Fallow deer for processing. He said that Poynter hadn’t and that “I had an attitude” the last time we spoke. I asked him if he processed pigs for Poynter and he conceded that he did but because of my “attitude” last time he wouldn’t even tell me if he [Poynter] was. (bringing in Fallow deer) Well the fact of the matter is, I didn’t have an ‘attitude last time’, we spoke amicably and ended our little meeting on perfectly reasonable terms. Because he lied about the temperament of our last meeting I decided that he was probably lying about Poynter not bringing in any deer as well. Why else would he lie about our first meeting. Attack is the best form of defence. I departed with, “Why do I get the feeling that you’re lying?”
And why do people lie for Poynter? Look at Robertson, He made a false statement to the cops and put himself at risk of very serious charges, then you have this home kill guy lying to me and falsely accusing me of having an attitude. Poynter and his silly wife parade up and down our boundry as though butter wouldn’t melt, they act as though they are immune from retaliation. The killing of the deer and goats didn’t do it, the false accusations to the cops didn’t do it. I’d be lying if I said I haven’t considered giving them a bit of their own medicine but I know Mr Plod is itching for that to happen so I’ll bide my time and leave it until I’ve got nothing left to lose.

Abject disregard for the rule of law.

It’s been a month since I rang Inspector Duncan MacLeod to see how my complaint, that Stephen Poynter and Tristan Robertson had conspired together to make a false allegation to Police that they had seen me with a firearm at 22a, was coming along. MacLeod told me that he had written to PNHQ legal section for an “opinion” on the matter and that he would let me know the result in due course. Snail mail again. Why is it that MacLeod and Co don’t seem to be able to move against Poynter without a PNHQ go ahead, are they that loath to bring charges against people who offend against me and hope that PNHQ will give them a reason to drop the matter? MacLeod did it with the firearms/intimidation charges and when PNHQ told them it was ok to go ahead they tried to sabotage the case with their ‘bond to keep the peace’ cobblers and when that didn’t work MacLeod’s new prosecutor saw to it that they lost the case and now it looks like they’re trying it on again.

My mate the cop came round today (28 July 08) and I showed him the dead deer, yes, it’s still laying where it was killed, and he said Poynter might have left it there to rot because his freezer may have been full. That is the sort of pathetic shite that has been trotted out to me in defence of Poynter and Robertson by this particular cop since day one. He also told me that that the Police didn’t present Poynter’s ‘litany of lies letter’ (my words) to the Court. It’s in the Court file, I saw it there, so Poynter must be responsible for it being there. Done to mislead the judge no doubt. I asked the cop how the latest “legal opinion” was coming along and he said it’s in the low priority heap down at PNHQ but that it should be in his hands before October 5 and that I shouldn’t concern myself at the delay because there is no statute of limitations on that particular crime. (Conspiracy to make a false accusation.)
One thing I forgot to ask him was, why wasn’t the “legal opinion” which stated that Poynter had committed an offence against the Firearms Act by discharging a his rifle in a built up area presented to the Court?

Mr Plod (McDonald) served me with no less than 5 trespass notices this morning, (3/9/08) all of them for properties that Poynter owes heaps of money on. He’s too thick to realize that banning me from his liabilities ain’t gonna save his lying carcase. I asked the cop, “What’s brought this on?” but he reckoned he didn’t know. I guess Poynter tried to lay a trespass complaint against me for having taken the dead deer photo. The tresspass notice for 26a is unenforceable anyway as the back boundry fence was wiped out by a big slip in the 2006 storm and it’s Poynter’s responsibility to reinstate it. What a tugger! Still no sign of the long awaited Legal Opinion by the way. You know these cops that are covering-up for Poynter are no better than that bastard John Dewar who perverted/defeated the course of justice for his rapist cop mates.

Well October 5 has come and gone and there’s still no sign of the promised ‘opinion’ or any charges. Direct action next I’m pickin!

Five more shots close to my home today. 10/10/07 Mr Plod responded to my 111 call and I told him what I knew and he did a QVR on a car that was parked in Poynter’s gateway. When he was finished I asked him who the car belonged to and he said it was a company car but he refused to tell me what company. I told him that I thought the driver of the car was Mathew K r s and he replied how do you say that name. I said to the cop that we should go and find the shooter and see what he was up to and he said he’d tool up first as the other fellow was armed. He took a Glock out of a locked steel box in the back of his station wagon. I noticed there was a black Bushmaster in the box too. He strapped the Glock on and I then suggested he should park his wagon behind the car in Poynter’s gate way to block it in. He did that. Then I spotted the shooter walking towards us about 150 meters away. He was carrying what turned out to be Poynter’s 243. The cop went over to the shooter and they then walked back to the cars. I went over and asked the cop who the shooter was and he refused to tell me because “He hasn’t committed an offence”. I asked him how he knew that and he replied, ‘He has the owners permission to shoot on his land.’ I asked the shooter if he was Mathew Krs and he said, ‘No.’ He also stated that he had shot three goats on Poynter’s land. I then walked back to my home and asked the wife, who had been listening to my scanner, if she had heard the shooter’s name mentioned and she said, “Matthew something.” I then went back to the cop and shooter and I told the cop that the shooter had lied about his name not being Matthew and the cop replied, ‘Not to me he hasn’t’. I then asked the cop to come with me to see if the shooter had shot anything on my place. He looked at his watch and said, ‘No, it’s too late in the day.’ I then said, ‘What if I find a dead goat on my place, he replied, ‘You might have carried it over from Poynters.’ This bastard cop was suggesting that I might be a justice perverter like Poynter. At that point I gave up on that cop and told him he was just like all the rest, fucken bent. I then went up the back and came across a live gut-shot goat well up in the bush outside Poynter’s boundary. I also observed a dead goat on Poynter’s land.

The charming Sergeant Colin Wright and Matthew (retard) KRS

Dead billy goat left to rot where I was certain to see it.

Check out comments 24 and 46.

Sergeant Andrew McDonald came round today 15/10 and he said, they (Poynter and Matthew Krs) are trying to provoke me into retaliating. I asked him if people who behave in that manner are fit and proper persons? He said, “We’ll see about that when their firearms licences come up for renewal.” That was just more bullshit of course.

I got the ‘final’ verdict today, this is the jist of it.

28 October 2008.

“I have received a final opinion from the Police Legal Team (Wellington) in relation to the allegation from you that Mr Poynter and Robertson conspired against you in relation to you being in posession of a firearm.

There is insufficient evidence to proceed with a serious charge of Perverting the Course of Justice or a lesser charge of Making a False Statement. This matter will now be filed.”

If the Police (Sergeant McDonald) had done a ‘proper’ and timely investigation into my complaint and then forwarded on the evidence gathered in that investigation to the Police Legal Team (Wellington) for an opinion I would have had to accept the outcome. But that didn’t happen did it? No proper investigation was made into my complaint, not a single statement was asked for or taken from anyone who might have been able to ‘help Police with their enquiries’ after I made my complaint. On 3/9/08 I asked McDonald, “Have you reinterviewed Poynter and Robertson in relation to my latest complaint?” He replied, “No.” I then asked, “Why not?” And he replied, “Because I already know what they would say.” So I went on and asked, “Have you spoken to the people who signed those bits of paper I gave you?” McDonald replied, “No”

They (McDonald and MacLeod) did nothing except look for a ‘legal’ way to do nothing. They asked Wellington for an ‘opinion’ based on nothing but my untested allegation. Well they got the ‘opinion’ they desired and in doing so joined the Conspiracy to Defeat the Course of Justice. Move over John Dewar.

Further on McDonald wrote this, “Under the provisions of the Official Information Act 1982, I am not required to provide a copy of any communication between Police and our legal team as this communication is considered privileged.”

There you have it folks, a clear admission that the cops have a lot to hide in this matter. If they had nothing to hide they’d be open and honest. You do know that it isn’t an offence under the Crimes act to be open and honest don’t you boys? You could provide me with the communication documents and prove to me that you have acted with good faith if you wanted to.

McDonald finished off his fraud of a letter with, “I know this is not the outcome you were after but still hope you and Mr Poynter can overcome your differences and work together to resolve all issues between you.”

What this lying fool McDonald is forgetting is that it was Poynter that fired all those shots, that it was Poynter who made the threats while armed with a rifle, that it was Poynter who wrote that ‘litany of lies’ letter to Sergeant Smith, that it was Poynter who conspired with Robertson to Bring a False Accusation against me, that it was Poynter who killed off the goats and deer in an attempt to provoke me into retaliation, that it was Poynter and his retarded Nephew Mathew Krs who left dead and dying goats and deer all over the show etc, etc. If McDonald thinks that anything can be salvaged out of that little lot then he his an even bigger idiot than Stephen (child endangerer) Poynter.

I told McDonald at the outset that if the Police did not press Conspiracy to Bring a False Accusation charges against Poynter and Robertson I would do it myself. I suppose they’ll try to derail my private prosecution next.

You’ve got no f**ken idea, you wait. You wait, you c**t. I’ll f**ken get ya, you f**ken wait. Prophetic words indeed.

I see Poynter is wearing his safety glasses. It would appear that retardation is a Poynter family trait, he thought the dead deer photo was hilarious, but this one, the one that proves he’s an idiot as well as a smug arsehole, hasn’t gone down too well in the Poynter camp.

A bit more child spraying at the Poynter rubbish dump.

Poynter demonstrating the safe way to transport young kids on a quad bike.

An idiot wrapped in a moron!

TO BE CONTINUED…………………….

Tags: Lady Joy Rest Home